arnegiacomo/fugleramme - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Bird frame for Raspberry Pi or your homelab - real-time bird detection by audio, fully local AI, rendered as real, hand-cut 1800s bird illustrations. On an e-ink panel, a TV, or any screen.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 29/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is arnegiacomo/fugleramme welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

arnegiacomo/fugleramme has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in arnegiacomo/fugleramme respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 29.2 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 29.2 places arnegiacomo/fugleramme in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for arnegiacomo/fugleramme?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for arnegiacomo/fugleramme is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in arnegiacomo/fugleramme?

arnegiacomo/fugleramme currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

arnegiacomo
arnegiacomo/fuglerammeD•Risky3.7k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
arnegiacomo

arnegiacomo/fugleramme

3,657
InactiveD•Risky(29/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Bird frame for Raspberry Pi or your homelab - real-time bird detection by audio, fully local AI, rendered as real, hand-cut 1800s bird illustrations. On an e-ink panel, a TV, or any screen.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.6/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Collaborative maintainer environment in arnegiacomo/fugleramme. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in arnegiacomo/fugleramme focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Run the repository formatter and linter locally
  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not submit formatting-only noise with feature changes
  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
6 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for arnegiacomo/fugleramme
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/arnegiacomo/fugleramme)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/arnegiacomo/fugleramme?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Species Sphyrapicus varius (Yellow-bellied Sapsucker) - 2 detections Zonotrichia albicollis (White-throated Sparrow) - 1 detection Region East USA Plates you have in mind No response

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Species Strepera graculina (Pied Currawong) - 479 detections Entomyzon cyanotis (Blue-faced Honeyeater) - 150 detections Cacomantis flabelliformis (Fan-tailed Cuckoo) - 45 detections Corvus coronoides (Australian Raven) - 6 detections Vanellus miles (Masked Lapwing) - 6 detections Calyptorhynchus lathami (Glossy Black-Cockatoo) - 5 detections Manorina melanophrys (Bell Miner) - 2 detections Cacatua sanguinea (Little Corella) - 1 detection Monarcha melanopsis (Black-faced Monarch) - 1 detection Pardalotus punctatus (Spotted Pardalote) - 1 detection Symposiachrus trivirgatus (Spectacled Monarch) - 1 detection Region Australia/South East Queensland Plates you have in mind Strepera graculina (Pied Currawong) Entomyzon cyanotis (Blue-faced Honeyeater) Cacomantis flabelliformis (Fan-tailed Cuckoo) Corvus coronoides (Australian Raven) Vanellus miles (Masked Lapwing) Calyptorhynchus lathami (Glossy Black-Cockatoo) Manorina melanophrys (Bell Miner) Cacatua sanguinea (Little Corella) Monarcha

📅 Opened Oct 5, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Species Species: Psaltriparus minimus Region Pacific Northwest, USA Plates you have in mind Suggested plate: labelled #8 on The birds of North America (PL. XC) Maybe also/instead: labelled #3 on The birds of North America (PL. XCII), though seems a bit green-tinted closest high-res in our style is from Grizmek, but couldn't find a public license for this one

📅 Opened Oct 2, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Species: Horornis diphone Suggested plate: Wolf, 1847 (Tab. XIX) Also good: Wolf, 1847 (Tab. XX) Kittlitz, 1830 Other public-domain plates are welcome too. Good for a first cut - see Adding artwork and Contributing. Comment here if you pick it up, so nobody else cuts the same bird.

📅 Opened Sep 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Species: Spodiopsar cineraceus Suggested plate: Fauna Japonica, 1844-1850 Also good: Prêtre, 1838 Other public-domain plates are welcome too. Good for a first cut - see Adding artwork and Contributing. Comment here if you pick it up, so nobody else cuts the same bird.

📅 Opened Sep 30, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for arnegiacomo/fugleramme

When evaluating whether to contribute to arnegiacomo/fugleramme, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of arnegiacomo/fugleramme acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to arnegiacomo/fugleramme

01

Is arnegiacomo/fugleramme welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

arnegiacomo/fugleramme has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 29.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 29.2 places arnegiacomo/fugleramme in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for arnegiacomo/fugleramme?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in arnegiacomo/fugleramme?

Yes, arnegiacomo/fugleramme currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for arnegiacomo/fugleramme are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.