armadaproject/armada - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A multi-cluster batch queuing system for high-throughput workloads on Kubernetes.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 54/100

External PR Merge Rate: 72%

Response Time: 5d

First Timer Success: 59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is armadaproject/armada welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

armadaproject/armada has a recorded first-timer success rate of 58.8%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in armadaproject/armada respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 124.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 54.5 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 54.5 places armadaproject/armada in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for armadaproject/armada?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for armadaproject/armada is 72.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in armadaproject/armada?

armadaproject/armada currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

armadaproject
armadaproject/armadaBSolid627
GitHub
Back to Explorer
armadaproject

armadaproject/armada

627
BSolid(54/100)Go

A multi-cluster batch queuing system for high-throughput workloads on Kubernetes.

Compare
Jump to:
Response Velocity
5 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
72.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
58.8%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
13 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
72.0%
Merge Gauge
58.8%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe46/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for armadaproject/armada
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/armadaproject/armada)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/armadaproject/armada?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Context values are stored using bare string keys throughout the codebase: // internal/common/auth/common.go:14 const principalKey = "principal" // named constant, but still a plain string type // internal/common/auth/common.go:127 context.WithValue(ctx, "user", principal.GetName()) // internal/common/requestid/interceptors.go:46 context.WithValue(ctx, "requestId", id) All three are plain string keys. If any other package stores a context value under the same string (e.g., "user"), the values silently overwrite each other. Go's recommended pattern is to use an unexported custom type so that keys from different packages can never collide, even if they have the same underlying string value: type contextKey string const principalKey contextKey = "principal" Describe the solution you'd like Define an unexported contextKey type (e.g., in internal/common/auth/ or a shared location) Convert principalKey, the "user" key, and the

📅 Opened Mar 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. StartUp() in internal/binoculars/server.go calls os.Exit(-1) on initialization errors (lines 28 and 34) instead of returning an error. This means you can't unit test the function (the test process would just die), and it prevents the caller from doing any cleanup. // Current code (internal/binoculars/server.go) func StartUp(config *configuration.BinocularsConfig) (func(), *sync.WaitGroup) { // ... kubernetesClientProvider, err := cluster.NewKubernetesClientProvider(...) if err != nil { log.Errorf("Failed to connect to kubernetes because %s", err) os.Exit(-1) } authServices, err := auth.ConfigureAuth(config.Auth) if err != nil { log.Errorf("Failed to create auth services %s", err) os.Exit(-1) } // ... } In Go, library code (anything under internal/) should return errors and let the caller in cmd/ decide what to do. Only main() should call os.Exit or log.Fatal.

📅 Opened Mar 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. nodeTypeIdFromTaintsAndLabels() in internal/scheduler/internaltypes/node_type.go:133 generates uint64 hashes via FNV-1a to identify node types. There is an existing TODO from the author: TODO: We should test this function to ensure there are no collisions. And that the string is never empty. Hash collisions here don't break correctness, but they reduce scheduling efficiency by grouping different node types together. A test would confirm the hash function behaves well for realistic inputs and let us remove the TODO. Describe the solution you'd like Add a test in internal/scheduler/internaltypes/node_type_test.go that: Generates a large number of realistic taint/label combinations (different taint keys, values, effects, and indexing label values) Computes the hash for each combination Asserts no two distinct inputs produce the same hash Verifies the hash input string is never empty Getting started Look at how NodeType is

📅 Opened Mar 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Prometheus metric label names are repeated as string literals across internal/common/metrics/scheduler_metrics.go. If someone introduces a typo (e.g., "queu" instead of "queue"), Prometheus silently creates a new metric series instead of erroring. This kind of bug is hard to catch in review and hard to debug in production. Describe the solution you'd like Define label name constants at the top of the file and use them in metric definitions instead of raw strings. File to change internal/common/metrics/scheduler_metrics.go (lines 35-175). Label names like "pool", "queue", "priorityClass", "resourceType", "nodeType", "cluster", "phase", "accounting_role", "reservation", "physical_pool", "priceBand" are each repeated across many metric definitions in this file. Example // Before (same strings repeated across many definitions) prometheus.NewDesc(MetricPrefix+"queue_resource_queued", "...", []string{"pool", "priorityClass",

📅 Opened Mar 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. strings.Title() is deprecated since Go 1.18 and we still use it in two places in the scheduler metrics code. Describe the solution you'd like Replace both calls with cases.Title(language.English).String(...) from golang.org/x/text/cases and golang.org/x/text/language. Files to change internal/scheduler/metrics.go:484 - strings.Title(strings.ToLower(phase)) internal/scheduler/metrics.go:493 - strings.Title(strings.ToLower(phase)) Example // Before phase: strings.Title(strings.ToLower(phase)), // After phase: cases.Title(language.English).String(strings.ToLower(phase)), The cases.Title caser is safe for concurrent use, so you can create it once as a package-level variable rather than creating a new one on every call. Acceptance criteria Both strings.Title() calls replaced No strings.Title import remains go test ./internal/scheduler/... passes golangci-lint run ./internal/scheduler/... passes

📅 Opened Mar 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for armadaproject/armada

When evaluating whether to contribute to armadaproject/armada, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of armadaproject/armada acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 72.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to armadaproject/armada

01

Is armadaproject/armada welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

armadaproject/armada has a recorded first-timer success rate of 58.8%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 54.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 54.5 places armadaproject/armada in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for armadaproject/armada?

The external pull request merge rate is 72.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in armadaproject/armada?

Yes, armadaproject/armada currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for armadaproject/armada are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.