apple/container - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A tool for creating and running Linux containers using lightweight virtual machines on a Mac. It is written in Swift, and optimized for Apple silicon.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 46/100

External PR Merge Rate: 51%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is apple/container welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apple/container has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in apple/container respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 54.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 46.0 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 46.0 places apple/container in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apple/container?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for apple/container is 51.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in apple/container?

apple/container currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

apple
apple/containerBSolid49.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
apple

apple/container

49,508
BSolid(46/100)Swift

A tool for creating and running Linux containers using lightweight virtual machines on a Mac. It is written in Swift, and optimized for Apple silicon.

Compare
Jump to:
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
51.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
33.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
60 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
51.3%
Merge Gauge
33.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe31/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for apple/container
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/apple/container)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/apple/container?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Feature or enhancement request details NOTE: Depends on #1425; there's no point tackling this until the TOML configuration is in place. We've a number of issues relating to DNS resolution from containers not working properly when a third party DNS server conflicts with the server that macOS mDNSResponder wants to start. Until an OS-level solution can be provided, it would be useful to have a system property (and potentially environment variables if session level overrides seem sensible) that allows the user to configure default values for --dns. We can also consider properties for the other DNS CLI options here as well. Code of Conduct I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

📅 Opened Apr 25, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Swift beginner tasks?Explore Swift GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for apple/container

When evaluating whether to contribute to apple/container, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of apple/container acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 51.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to apple/container

01

Is apple/container welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apple/container has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 46.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 46.0 places apple/container in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apple/container?

The external pull request merge rate is 51.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in apple/container?

Yes, apple/container currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for apple/container are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.