apache/kvrocks - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Apache Kvrocks is a distributed key value NoSQL database that uses RocksDB as storage engine and is compatible with Redis protocol.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 64%

Response Time: 19h

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is apache/kvrocks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apache/kvrocks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in apache/kvrocks respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 19.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.0 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.0 places apache/kvrocks in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/kvrocks?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/kvrocks is 64.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in apache/kvrocks?

apache/kvrocks currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

apache
apache/kvrocksA•Welcoming4.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
apache

apache/kvrocks

4,458
InactiveA•Welcoming(60/100)C++

Apache Kvrocks is a distributed key value NoSQL database that uses RocksDB as storage engine and is compatible with Redis protocol.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.3/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Highly welcoming maintainers in apache/kvrocks. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
19 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
64.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
24 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
64.3%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe56/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for apache/kvrocks
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/apache/kvrocks)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/apache/kvrocks?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Search before asking I had searched in the issues and found no similar framework-level issue. I found issues about specific subcommands or documentation, but not one about making subcommands a first-class command abstraction. Motivation Kvrocks has many Redis-compatible command families whose behavior is selected by the second token, such as COMMAND GETKEYS, CONFIG GET/SET, CLIENT LIST/KILL, CLUSTER *, SCRIPT *, and NAMESPACE GET/SET/ADD/DEL/CURRENT. Currently, these subcommands are usually handled inside the root command implementation by manually parsing args_[1]. This makes subcommands second-class from the command framework's point of view: Subcommands cannot have their own registered metadata, such as arity, flags, key specs, and category. Command resolution, key extraction, command renaming, Lua command invocation, and command introspection have to reason about only the root command. Root command implementations tend to become large dispatchers instead of focused command hand

📅 Opened Jun 11, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

This thread collects open issues that are suitable for contributors who want to work on Apache Kvrocks. We very much welcome anyone to claim the tasks and start contributing to Kvrocks. If you need any help during the contribution process, you can leave a message under the corresponding issue. Good first issues High priority: #3517 #3128 #2302 #2628 #884 #755 #3552 Redis compatibility High priority: #3518 High priority: #3123 #3411 #3073 #2610 #2500 #2414 #2133 #3319 #3436 CI and reliability High priority: #3515 #3157 #3153 #3100 #1759 Cluster and replication #3498 #3496 #3495 #3147 #3113 #3095 #2473 #2177 Performance and optimization #3314 #2144 #2398 #2305 #2297

📅 Opened Jun 11, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for apache/kvrocks

When evaluating whether to contribute to apache/kvrocks, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of apache/kvrocks acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 19 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 64.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to apache/kvrocks

01

Is apache/kvrocks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apache/kvrocks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~19 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.0 places apache/kvrocks in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/kvrocks?

The external pull request merge rate is 64.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in apache/kvrocks?

Yes, apache/kvrocks currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for apache/kvrocks are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.