apache/iggy - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Apache Iggy: Hyper-Efficient Message Streaming at Laser Speed

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 69%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is apache/iggy welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apache/iggy has a recorded first-timer success rate of 67.6%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in apache/iggy respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.4 places apache/iggy in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/iggy?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/iggy is 68.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in apache/iggy?

apache/iggy does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

apache
apache/iggyA•Welcoming5.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
apache

apache/iggy

5,080
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(63/100)Rust

Apache Iggy: Hyper-Efficient Message Streaming at Laser Speed

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.8/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in apache/iggy. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
68.8%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
67.6%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
63 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
68.8%
Merge Gauge
67.6%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe48/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for apache/iggy
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/apache/iggy)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/apache/iggy?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

The Rust client parses iggy:// connection strings (core/common/src/types/configuration/auth_config/connection_string.rs), and the Node and C# SDKs do too. The Java SDK has no parser, so Java users set host, port and credentials by hand. What to do Add public IggyTcpClientBuilder fromConnectionString(String connectionString) to foreign/java/java-sdk/src/main/java/org/apache/iggy/builder/TcpClientBuilder.java. Accept iggy:// and iggy+tcp://, with user:password@host:port and tls=true as a query option. Reject other schemes such as iggy+quic://. Follow parseConnectionString in foreign/node/src/client/client.connection-string.ts. Delegate to the existing builder methods: blocking().host(...).port(...).credentials(...).tls(...). Username and password only: the Java builders have no personal access token login, and adding one is out of scope. Add tests next to IggyTcpClientBuilderTest.java for valid strings, tls=true and rejected input. Done when Iggy.tcpClientBuilder().fromConnectionString

📅 Opened Oct 12, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

The Rust client parses iggy:// connection strings (core/common/src/types/configuration/auth_config/connection_string.rs), and the Node and C# SDKs do too. The Go SDK has no parser, so Go users build the TCP options by hand. What to do Add func ParseConnectionString(connectionString string) ([]tcp.Option, error) in a new file, foreign/go/client/connection_string.go. Accept iggy:// and iggy+tcp://, with user:password@host:port or a personal access token before the @, and tls=true as a query option. Reject other schemes such as iggy+quic://. Follow parseConnectionString in foreign/node/src/client/client.connection-string.ts. Build the result from the existing options in foreign/go/client/tcp/tcp_core.go: WithServerAddress, WithAutoLogin with NewUsernamePasswordCredentials or NewPersonalAccessTokenCredentials, and WithTLS. Do not add new credential or TLS types. Add a table test in foreign/go/client/connection_string_test.go for valid strings, tls=true, both credential types, and rejected

📅 Opened Oct 12, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Split from #4452. Problem When a command fails, main returns the error (core/cli/src/main.rs:359), so Rust prints its Debug value. For example, iggy ping against a stopped server ends with: Error: IggyClient(SdkError(CannotEstablishConnection)) The top-level Display is only a label, for example "Iggy client error", so printing Display alone does not help either. Proposal Handle the error in main: print the error and its cause chain to stderr, one cause per line, and exit with code 1. Do not change the exit codes here. Distinct exit codes stay in #4452. Acceptance iggy ping against a stopped server prints a readable message and its causes, with no Rust type names. A failing command still exits with code 1. Existing CLI integration tests that check error output are updated and pass.

📅 Opened Oct 8, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Split from #4451. Problem The CLI reads credentials from IGGY_USERNAME and IGGY_PASSWORD (core/cli/src/credentials.rs:38-39, :148), but no variable holds a token. A CI job has to pass the token with -t, where the process list shows it, or write it to contexts.toml. Proposal Read IGGY_TOKEN in credentials.rs, next to the IGGY_USERNAME and IGGY_PASSWORD pair. Order: the flags win over IGGY_TOKEN, and IGGY_TOKEN wins over the username and password pair. Keep this in credentials.rs, not as a clap env attribute. In its conflict rules clap treats an environment value like a flag, so -u would fail while the variable is set. Mention IGGY_TOKEN, IGGY_USERNAME and IGGY_PASSWORD in the --help text of the credential flags. Acceptance With IGGY_TOKEN set to a valid PAT and no credential flags, iggy stream list succeeds. -u/-p or -t on the command line override IGGY_TOKEN. With IGGY_TOKEN and the username and password pair all set, the token is used. A test in core/integration/tests/cli/user/test

📅 Opened Oct 8, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Split from #4447. Problem You cannot see consumer lag (the messages that a group did not consume yet). iggy consumer-group get shows members and partitions, but no offsets (core/cli/src/commands/binary_consumer_groups/get_consumer_group.rs). consumer-offset get shows one partition per call. Proposal Add a partitions table to consumer-group get, one row per partition of the topic: partition, member, current offset, stored offset and lag. Read each offset with get_consumer_offset and a Consumer of kind ConsumerGroup. A client does not need to be a member to read a group offset. The result is ConsumerOffsetInfo (core/common/src/types/consumer/consumer_offset_info.rs:26). The stored offset is the last consumed offset, so the lag is the current offset minus the stored offset. If no offset is stored, show - for the stored offset, and use the message count of the partition as the lag. The member column comes from the members list that the command already reads. Notes Over HTTP the group ki

📅 Opened Oct 8, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for apache/iggy

When evaluating whether to contribute to apache/iggy, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of apache/iggy acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 68.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to apache/iggy

01

Is apache/iggy welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apache/iggy has a recorded first-timer success rate of 67.6%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.4 places apache/iggy in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/iggy?

The external pull request merge rate is 68.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in apache/iggy?

apache/iggy does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for apache/iggy are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.