apache/geaflow - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Apache GeaFlow: A Streaming Graph Computing Engine.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100

External PR Merge Rate: 31%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is apache/geaflow welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apache/geaflow has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in apache/geaflow respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.3 places apache/geaflow in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/geaflow?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/geaflow is 30.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in apache/geaflow?

apache/geaflow currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

apache
apache/geaflowA•Welcoming805
GitHub
Back to Explorer
apache

apache/geaflow

805
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(65/100)Java

Apache GeaFlow: A Streaming Graph Computing Engine.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
7.7/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Balanced & professional review environment in apache/geaflow. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
30.8%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
33.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
23 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
30.8%
Merge Gauge
33.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe22/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for apache/geaflow
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/apache/geaflow)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/apache/geaflow?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

What & why GeaFlow has PageRank and ClosenessCentrality, but not Betweenness Centrality — a measure of how often a vertex sits on shortest paths between other vertices, i.e. how much of a "bridge" it is. It's a core metric for social-network and key-node analysis. It's also genuinely hard: the classic Brandes algorithm has two phases (shortest-path counting + dependency accumulation), which makes it a satisfying high-difficulty challenge. GeaFlow 有 PageRank、ClosenessCentrality,但缺介数中心性(Betweenness)——衡量一个 顶点作为"最短路径桥梁"的重要性,是社交网络/关键节点分析的核心指标。它实现难度大 (经典 Brandes 算法需要两阶段:最短路径计数 + 依赖累积),非常适合作为高难度挑战题。 The task Implement Betweenness Centrality on GeaFlow's vertex-centric / message-passing model (an unweighted-graph version is a fine first cut). 基于 GeaFlow 的顶点中心/消息传递模型实现介数中心性(可先做无

📅 Opened Jun 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

What & why There are 7 store backends today, but none is a zero-external-dependency embedded option: SQLite (embedded SQL) or LevelDB (embedded KV). For single-node / edge / testing scenarios, this is lighter than RocksDB and adds persistence over Memory — a clear value gap. 现有 store 后端 7 种,但缺少零外部依赖的嵌入式选项:SQLite(嵌入式 SQL)或 LevelDB(嵌入式 KV)。对单机/边缘/测试场景,比 RocksDB 更轻、比 Memory 多了持久化,价值明确。 The task Create geaflow-store-sqlite (or -leveldb), implementing the storage SPI with basic KV + graph storage and state archive/recovery. 新建 geaflow-store-sqlite(或 -leveldb),实现存储 SPI,支持 KV 与图存储基本能力 + 状态归档/恢复。 Where to look / 怎么做 Simple baseline: geaflow-store-memory. Persistence/versioning: geaflow-store-rocksdb. Relational: geaflow-store-jdbc. Implement XxxStoreBuilder (IStoreBuilder) + the matching IGraphStore / IKVStore / IStatefulStore. SPI regis

📅 Opened Jun 18, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

What & why The project already has a Redis store (a state backend) but no Redis connector (treating Redis as a data source/sink). They serve different roles: the store backs the engine's internal state, while a connector backs DSL table reads/writes. Redis as a dimension table or result cache is very common. 项目已有 Redis store(状态后端),但没有 Redis connector(把 Redis 当数据源/汇)。 两者职责不同:store 服务于引擎内部状态,connector 服务于 DSL 建表读写。Redis 作维表/结果缓存很常见。 The task Create geaflow-dsl-connector-redis: the sink supports writing string/hash, the source supports scanning by key pattern. 新建 geaflow-dsl-connector-redis,sink 支持写 string/hash,source 支持按 key 模式扫描读取。 Where to look / 怎么做 References: the minimal geaflow-dsl-connector-console (sink only) and the connection-managing geaflow-dsl-connector-elasticsearch. Reuse the Redis client already in the project — check which client

📅 Opened Jun 18, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

What & why ClickHouse is a popular OLAP database, often the downstream analytics layer for graph-computing results. You can technically connect today via the JDBC connector, but it lacks ClickHouse-tuned batch writes (buffering + columnar writes), so performance suffers. ClickHouse 是流行的 OLAP 数据库,常作为图计算结果的下游分析层。现在用 JDBC connector 勉强能连,但缺针对 ClickHouse 的高效批量写(攒批 + 列式写入),性能差。 The task Create geaflow-dsl-connector-clickhouse, focusing the sink on efficient batched writes (buffer + flush threshold); the source should support parallel partitioned reads. 新建 geaflow-dsl-connector-clickhouse,重点优化 sink 批量写(buffer + flush 阈值), source 支持按分区并行读。 Where to look / 怎么做 Use geaflow-dsl-connector-jdbc as a baseline and spot the differences between "generic JDBC" and "ClickHouse-specific". Sink batching: write() goes into a buffer; commit in bulk on threshold or f

📅 Opened Jun 18, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

What & why The most basic graph metric is a vertex's degree — in-degree, out-degree, total. It's a building block for many heavier algorithms, but there's no built-in one-shot version yet. This is the best possible first taste of the vertex-centric / message-passing model: simpler than PageRank, but you still walk the full algorithm interface end to end. 图分析最基础的指标就是顶点的度(入度/出度/总度),它是很多复杂算法的前置特征, 但目前没有内置算法。这是入门"顶点中心 / 消息传递"模型的最佳第一题——比 PageRank 简单, 却完整走一遍算法接口。 The task Implement Degree: for each vertex, output (id, in_degree, out_degree). No message passing needed — you can count directly with loadEdges(IN/OUT), which makes it a clean way to learn the API. 实现 Degree:每个顶点输出 (id, in_degree, out_degree)。不用消息传递,直接用 loadEdges(IN/OUT) 统计即可,特别适合熟悉 API。 Where to look The simple

📅 Opened Jun 18, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for apache/geaflow

When evaluating whether to contribute to apache/geaflow, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of apache/geaflow acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 30.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to apache/geaflow

01

Is apache/geaflow welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apache/geaflow has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.3 places apache/geaflow in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/geaflow?

The external pull request merge rate is 30.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in apache/geaflow?

Yes, apache/geaflow currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for apache/geaflow are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.