apache/beam - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Apache Beam is a unified programming model for Batch and Streaming data processing.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 68/100

External PR Merge Rate: 67%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is apache/beam welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apache/beam has a recorded first-timer success rate of 65.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in apache/beam respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 67.9 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 67.9 places apache/beam in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/beam?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/beam is 67.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in apache/beam?

apache/beam currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

apache
apache/beamA•Welcoming8.7k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
apache

apache/beam

8,684
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(68/100)Java

Apache Beam is a unified programming model for Batch and Streaming data processing.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.8/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in apache/beam. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
67.1%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
65.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
80 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
67.1%
Merge Gauge
65.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe46/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for apache/beam
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/apache/beam)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/apache/beam?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

What needs to happen? Logical types defined in https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/model/pipeline/src/main/proto/org/apache/beam/model/pipeline/v1/schema.proto are not supported in Go SDK. This prevents Go SDK to use schema transforms in a meaningful way. Currently, only PYTHON_CALLABLE appear to be supported, beam/sdks/go/pkg/beam/transforms/xlang/python/external.go Line 42 in 1318bfe beam.RegisterSchemaProviderWithURN(pcsType, &callableSourceProvider{}, pythonCallableUrn) however, through a different mechanism. Likely we need to first implement a framework for portable logical types in Golang, then implement each of them Issue Priority Priority: 2 (default / most normal work should be filed as P2) Issue Components Component: Python SDK Component: Java SDK Component: Go SDK Component: Typescript SDK Component: IO connector Component: Beam YAML Component: Bea

📅 Opened Aug 7, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

What would you like to happen? both Flink and Dataflow supports that. PipelineResult allow stopping pipeline, drain may be helpful addition. Issue Priority Priority: 3 (nice-to-have improvement) Issue Components Component: Python SDK Component: Java SDK Component: Go SDK Component: Typescript SDK Component: IO connector Component: Beam YAML Component: Beam examples Component: Beam playground Component: Beam katas Component: Website Component: Infrastructure Component: Spark Runner Component: Flink Runner Component: Prism Runner Component: Twister2 Runner Component: Hazelcast Jet Runner Component: Google Cloud Dataflow Runner

📅 Opened Jun 2, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

What would you like to happen? In the case of high throughput jobs, we may want to disable metrics requests that adding pressures to backends. In Java SDK we honor pipeline option experiments "disableCounterMetrics", "disableStringSetMetrics", "disableBoundedTrieMetrics", but not yet in Python. Issue Priority Priority: 2 (default / most feature requests should be filed as P2) Issue Components Component: Python SDK Component: Java SDK Component: Go SDK Component: Typescript SDK Component: IO connector Component: Beam YAML Component: Beam examples Component: Beam playground Component: Beam katas Component: Website Component: Infrastructure Component: Spark Runner Component: Flink Runner Component: Prism Runner Component: Twister2 Runner Component: Hazelcast Jet Runner Component: Google Cloud Dataflow Runner

📅 Opened May 29, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

What would you like to happen? BigQuery IO does not have direct support for dedicated clone operations. https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/google-bigquery/ Issue Priority Priority: 2 (default / most feature requests should be filed as P2) Issue Components Component: Python SDK Component: Java SDK Component: Go SDK Component: Typescript SDK Component: IO connector Component: Beam YAML Component: Beam examples Component: Beam playground Component: Beam katas Component: Website Component: Infrastructure Component: Spark Runner Component: Flink Runner Component: Samza Runner Component: Twister2 Runner Component: Hazelcast Jet Runner Component: Google Cloud Dataflow Runner

📅 Opened Apr 28, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

There's an inconsistency in how FileSystems.get_filesystem() handles missing optional dependencies between GCS and S3. Current Behavior S3 (without aws extra): >>> from apache_beam.io import filesystems >>> filesystems.FileSystems.get_filesystem("s3://blah") <apache_beam.io.aws.s3filesystem.S3FileSystem at 0x11a0af750> Returns the filesystem object; validation happens later when the filesystem is actually used. GCS (without gcp extra): >>> from apache_beam.io import filesystems >>> filesystems.FileSystems.get_filesystem("gcs://blah") ValueError: Unable to get filesystem from specified path, please use the correct path or ensure the required dependency is installed, e.g., pip install apache-beam[gcp]. Path specified: gcs://blah Raises immediately because GCSFileSystem isn't registered as a subclass. Proposed Behavior Both should behave consistently. GCSFileSystem should be returned from get_filesystem() like S3FileSystem, allowing callers to validate dependencies when the filesystem is

📅 Opened Jan 29, 2026💬 22 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for apache/beam

When evaluating whether to contribute to apache/beam, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of apache/beam acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 67.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to apache/beam

01

Is apache/beam welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

apache/beam has a recorded first-timer success rate of 65.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 67.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 67.9 places apache/beam in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for apache/beam?

The external pull request merge rate is 67.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in apache/beam?

Yes, apache/beam currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for apache/beam are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.