android/nav3-recipes - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Implement common use cases with Jetpack Navigation 3

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 71/100

External PR Merge Rate: 85%

Response Time: 2h

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is android/nav3-recipes welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

android/nav3-recipes has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in android/nav3-recipes respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 1.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.4 C-Rankâ„¢ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.4 places android/nav3-recipes in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for android/nav3-recipes?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for android/nav3-recipes is 85.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in android/nav3-recipes?

android/nav3-recipes currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

android
android/nav3-recipesS•Elite1.4k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
android

android/nav3-recipes

1,362
S•Elite(71/100)Kotlin

Implement common use cases with Jetpack Navigation 3

Compare•
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.1/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in android/nav3-recipes. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
85.4%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
12 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
85.4%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe87/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for android/nav3-recipes
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/android/nav3-recipes)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/android/nav3-recipes?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

In general a scene implementation is expected to override key/entries/previousEntries/metadata in a specific way override equals/hashcode to preserve identity across recompositions To reduce boilerplate in general, we can consider an abstract class that implements the expected behaviour while still allowing users to override behavior if necessary: abstract class DecoratorScene<T: Any>(scene: Scene<T>) : Scene<T> { override val key = scene::class to scene.key override val entries = scene.entries override val previousEntries = scene.previousEntries override val metadata = scene.metadata override fun equals(other: Any?): Boolean = { ... } override fun hashCode(): Int { ... } }

📅 Opened Aug 13, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Consider adding a helper function to remember and persist a NavKey. Example use case: When implementing multiple back stacks, you can use rememberNavBackStack to create saveable back stacks. val stacks : Map<NavKey, MutableStateList<NavKey>> = mapOf( RouteA to rememberNavBackStack(RouteA), RouteB to rememberNavBackStack(RouteB) ) But you also need to keep track of, and persist the key for the current stack. Currently you need to do the following: val topLevelRoute = rememberSerializable( serializer = MutableStateSerializer(NavKeySerializer()) ){ mutableStateOf<NavKey>(RouteA) } It'd be helpful if you could just do: rememberNavKey(RouteA)

📅 Opened Aug 13, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Examples: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/512958359

📅 Opened Aug 11, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Currently, DeepLinkMatcher is the only official way to associate a key that supports a deep link to the type of deep link it supports. (i.e. UriDeepLinkMatcher associates the key : T with the url pattern it supports). Developers may optionally want to colocate them, i.e. interface DeepLinkKey { val uriPattern: String } data class UserKey( val id: Int ): DeepLinkKey { override val uriPattern: String get() = "www.nav3recipes.com/user/{id}" } Create a recipe showing such an interface and how to use it.

📅 Opened Jul 25, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Use the DeepLinkMatcher.withBackStack api. The recipe should show conditional back stack building based on deep link key's properties, i.e. something like this https://cs.android.com/androidx/platform/frameworks/support/+/androidx-main:navigation3/navigation3-runtime/samples/src/main/kotlin/androidx/navigation3/runtime/samples/deeplink/DeepLinkMatcherSample.kt;l=77?q=deeplinksampl

📅 Opened Jul 25, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute
Looking for more Kotlin beginner tasks?Explore Kotlin GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for android/nav3-recipes

When evaluating whether to contribute to android/nav3-recipes, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of android/nav3-recipes acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 85.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to android/nav3-recipes

01

Is android/nav3-recipes welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

android/nav3-recipes has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.4 C-Rankâ„¢ score represent?

The C-Rankâ„¢ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.4 places android/nav3-recipes in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for android/nav3-recipes?

The external pull request merge rate is 85.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in android/nav3-recipes?

Yes, android/nav3-recipes currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rankâ„¢ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for android/nav3-recipes are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.

android/nav3-recipes • 71.4/100 C-Rank (S-Tier) | GetMerged