amponce/archive-movie-browser - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Movie browser and player for archive.org

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 25/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is amponce/archive-movie-browser welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

amponce/archive-movie-browser has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in amponce/archive-movie-browser respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 25.4 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 25.4 places amponce/archive-movie-browser in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for amponce/archive-movie-browser?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for amponce/archive-movie-browser is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in amponce/archive-movie-browser?

amponce/archive-movie-browser currently has 14 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

amponce
amponce/archive-movie-browserD•Risky148
GitHub
Back to Explorer
amponce

amponce/archive-movie-browser

148
InactiveD•Risky(25/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)JavaScript

Movie browser and player for archive.org

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.9/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in amponce/archive-movie-browser. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in amponce/archive-movie-browser focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for amponce/archive-movie-browser
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/amponce/archive-movie-browser)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/amponce/archive-movie-browser?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

What happens Descriptions from Archive.org are turned into plain text, but only a handful of entities are decoded, so Caf&eacute;, &copy; 1956, &mdash; and &hellip; show exactly like that. A > inside a quoted attribute (<a href="x>y">) also leaks y"> into the text. What should happen Café © 1956 — link … Steps to reproduce In the repo: node --input-type=module -e "import {plainText} from './src/services/plainText.js'; console.log(plainText('Caf&eacute; &copy; 1956 &mdash; <a href=\"x>y\">link</a> &hellip;'))" Where to look src/services/plainText.js (a bigger entity table, or numeric decoding plus the common named ones; keep it working in node, since the MCP server uses it too). How to check Add these cases to the plainText test file; npm test passes.

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

What happens When a filter removes every film in the first batch but Archive.org still has more pages, /browse says "No movies found matching your criteria" and shows a Load more button underneath. Clicking Load more can fetch several more pages, still find nothing, and the page looks exactly the same, so it feels broken. What should happen One clear state. Either "Nothing yet in the uploads checked so far" with a "Keep looking" button, or just the empty state. Steps to reproduce Open https://www.orphanedfilms.com/browse and pick a collection that is mostly short uploads, then set the runtime filter to 90+ minutes. See the empty message and Load more together. Click Load more: nothing visible changes. (Easiest locally: mock Archive.org's search to return only 1-minute uploads with a large numFound.) Where to look src/components/browse/FilmGrid.jsx: the empty-state block keys on movies.length === 0 and the Load more block keys on nextPage, so both render. How to check With the mock ab

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

A round of small, well-scoped fixes found while testing the site end to end. Each sub-issue says what happens, what should happen, how to reproduce it on the live site, and where the fix likely lives. Most are one or two files. New here? Pick one, say you're taking it, and open a draft PR (see CONTRIBUTING.md for the claim rules). Questions are welcome on any of them. More will be added here as these get picked up.

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

What happens README "Feeds" says /api/tv/guide.xml is "XMLTV for the next 24 hours"; it runs from six hours ago to three days ahead (the /iptv page says this correctly). The table also leaves out /api/tv/channels.m3u and /api/tv/live/<channel-id>. The "How it is built" map lists five pages, four API functions and four scripts; the repo now has eleven pages, eight API functions and ten scripts, plus shelves.json/channels.json in src/programme and new hooks and ui primitives (also missing from src/ui/README.md). The "poster index" link at the top of mcp/README.md points to ../README.md#poster-index, which doesn't exist; the section is "How films get identified". What should happen The docs match the repo. Steps to reproduce Compare README "Feeds" with https://www.orphanedfilms.com/api/tv/guide.xml (last <programme> dates) and the /iptv page; compare "How it is built" with ls src/pages api scripts src/programme src/hooks src/ui; click "poster index" in mcp/README.md on GitHub. Where to

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

What happens In grid view on /browse, every card whose upload has no description asks our TMDB proxy for the film's full details (with cast) just to get the plot summary. The summary only shows in list view, so in the default grid those 24 requests per page (24 more per Load more) are wasted and slow down the lookups the page does need. What should happen No detail requests in grid view. Steps to reproduce Open https://www.orphanedfilms.com/browse in a private window with DevTools > Network filtered to api/tmdb: about 24 path=movie/…&append_to_response=credits requests, while no card shows a description. Where to look The overview effect in src/components/MovieCard.jsx: only run it when viewMode === 'list'. How to check Grid view: 0 of those requests. Switch to list view: descriptions still appear.

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more JavaScript beginner tasks?Explore JavaScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for amponce/archive-movie-browser

When evaluating whether to contribute to amponce/archive-movie-browser, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of amponce/archive-movie-browser acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to amponce/archive-movie-browser

01

Is amponce/archive-movie-browser welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

amponce/archive-movie-browser has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 25.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 25.4 places amponce/archive-movie-browser in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for amponce/archive-movie-browser?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in amponce/archive-movie-browser?

Yes, amponce/archive-movie-browser currently has 14 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for amponce/archive-movie-browser are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.