amber-lang/amber - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

💎 Amber the programming language compiled to Bash/Ksh/Zsh

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 79%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is amber-lang/amber welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

amber-lang/amber has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in amber-lang/amber respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 25.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 62.7 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 62.7 places amber-lang/amber in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for amber-lang/amber?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for amber-lang/amber is 79.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in amber-lang/amber?

amber-lang/amber currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

amber-lang
amber-lang/amberAWelcoming5.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
amber-lang

amber-lang/amber

5,210
AWelcoming(63/100)Rust

💎 Amber the programming language compiled to Bash/Ksh/Zsh

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in amber-lang/amber. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
79.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
83.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
18 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
79.2%
Merge Gauge
83.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe68/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for amber-lang/amber
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/amber-lang/amber)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/amber-lang/amber?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Summary Amber is licensed under LGPL-3.0, and the compiled Bash output inlines Amber's standard library functions directly. This makes every generated script a Combined Work under the LGPL, so anyone distributing an Amber-compiled script inherits the LGPL's notice and source-availability obligations. Why it happens The stdlib is not referenced at runtime, it is copied into the output at compile time. These are derivative works of Amber's LGPL stdlib. To distribute the output in compliance, the distributor must: (LGPL §4, Combined Works) §4(a) - give prominent notice that Amber's library is used and is LGPL-covered §4(b) - accompany the work with copies of the GPL and LGPL texts §4(d)(0) - make the corresponding source available (the Amber stdlib version used, plus the application sources) so a recipient can rebuild with a modified library The current generated header carries no license notice at all: #!/usr/bin/env bash # Written in [Amber](https://amber-lang.com/) # version: 0.6

📅 Opened Aug 24, 2026💬 9 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Description Amber does not directly support short-circuit evaluation when functions are used inside inline logical expressions (and / or). Because Amber pre-calculates function outputs into temporary variables before evaluating, all functions in the expression are executed unconditionally. Since Amber compiles to Bash (which natively supports short-circuiting), this behavior is highly counter-intuitive and can introduce side effects or unexpected performance bottlenecks. However, short-circuiting can still be achieved indirectly by using nested statements (eg.: If statements). This architectural difference and its indirect solution should be explicitly documented under the Expressions :: Logical Operations section to guide developers toward idiomatically correct code. Reproducible example no-short-circuit.ab #!/usr/bin/env amber import { date_format_posix, date_now } from "std/date" import { echo_info, echo_warning } from "std/env" fun first_condition(): Bool { echo_info("Startin

📅 Opened Jul 26, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

To track new stuff for the stdlib. Web server, maybe using python, php and other based on what is found on the machine without implementing a pure bash server (for now) upload way using curl or other solution

📅 Opened Feb 3, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

What we can do is evaluating a CI for this task in clippy. Ref: rust-lang/rust-clippy#3793 In this way we can have reports about what Rust code can be simplified and we can have newcomers easy task.

📅 Opened Dec 22, 2025💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Like we did for sudo so the code will be still executed also if the shell is closed. Proposed syntax: let job = async foo() // This calls `bg` detach foo() // This calls `nohup` await job // This calls `fg`

📅 Opened Dec 18, 2025💬 12 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for amber-lang/amber

When evaluating whether to contribute to amber-lang/amber, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of amber-lang/amber acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 79.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to amber-lang/amber

01

Is amber-lang/amber welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

amber-lang/amber has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 62.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 62.7 places amber-lang/amber in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for amber-lang/amber?

The external pull request merge rate is 79.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in amber-lang/amber?

Yes, amber-lang/amber currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for amber-lang/amber are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.