allgpt-co/QuickVoice - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Open-source, self-hostable platform for building and operating AI phone agents.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 64%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is allgpt-co/QuickVoice welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

allgpt-co/QuickVoice has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in allgpt-co/QuickVoice respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 32.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 59.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 59.2 places allgpt-co/QuickVoice in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for allgpt-co/QuickVoice?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for allgpt-co/QuickVoice is 63.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in allgpt-co/QuickVoice?

allgpt-co/QuickVoice currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

allgpt-co
allgpt-co/QuickVoiceAWelcoming493
GitHub
Back to Explorer
allgpt-co

allgpt-co/QuickVoice

493
AWelcoming(59/100)TypeScript

Open-source, self-hostable platform for building and operating AI phone agents.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.6/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Collaborative maintainer environment in allgpt-co/QuickVoice. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
83.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
8 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.6%
Merge Gauge
83.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe56/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for allgpt-co/QuickVoice
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/allgpt-co/QuickVoice)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/allgpt-co/QuickVoice?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Why: Release notes, changelog entries, version names, and known-limit sections can diverge during manual preparation. Scope: Add a Node script that accepts a candidate version. Confirm the changelog has the expected release heading before publish mode. Confirm the matching release-notes file exists and includes status, install requirements, known limitations, and verification. Provide a draft mode that passes while v0.1.0 remains explicitly unreleased. Acceptance criteria: Draft mode recognizes v0.1.0-draft.md without claiming a release exists. Publish mode fails if the changelog, filename, title, and candidate version disagree. Tests use temporary synthetic Markdown fixtures. The script does not create a tag, release, commit, or remote change. The release checklist documents the command. Effort: S Verification: node --test tests/<new-release-metadata-test>.test.mjs pnpm <new-release-check-command> -- v0.1.0 --draft Out of scope: Automatically publishing a release.

📅 Opened Jul 24, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Why: The repository does not yet provide a Dev Container, so contributors need an optional, reproducible environment that is validated rather than implied. Scope: Add a minimal .devcontainer/devcontainer.json and any narrowly required supporting files. Base the environment on the documented Linux or WSL2 prerequisites without embedding credentials. Add a narrowly scoped workflow or test that parses and builds the configuration. Parse the resolved configuration with the Dev Container CLI. Verify Node, Python, Docker Compose, Corepack, pnpm, and Go Task versions in the built container. Do not start the full application or external provider integrations. Acceptance criteria: The container setup documents its supported host assumptions and resource requirements. The check runs only when Dev Container or setup files change, unless maintainers choose a scheduled run. Feature references resolve and the container builds on the selected CI architecture. Version output proves Node satisfi

📅 Opened Jul 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Why: Setup docs list providers, but evaluators need one factual table showing which workflows can be inspected locally and which require their own accounts. Scope: Add docs/setup/provider-boundaries.md. Cover LiveKit, Twilio, Telnyx, speech/model providers, Pinecone, S3-compatible storage, Stripe, OAuth, and email. Ground every row in a tracked env template and current code path. State whether a local substitute exists, such as Mailpit for SMTP. Acceptance criteria: Every provider row cites a repository path. The table distinguishes service startup from successful provider-backed behavior. No row claims a partnership, certification, SLA, or included account. Examples use variable names only and never credential values. README setup boundaries link the matrix. Effort: M Verification: rg -n "LIVEKIT_|TWILIO_|TELNYX_|STRIPE_|PINECONE_|SMTP_|AWS_" \ .env.dev.example apps/server/.env.dev.example apps/ai/.env.dev.example Out of scope: Provider pricing comparisons or account setup

📅 Opened Jul 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Why: macOS ships Bash 3.2 while QuickVoice orchestration uses Bash 4+ features. Scope: Add docs/setup/macos.md. Explain how #!/usr/bin/env bash resolves Bash from PATH. Document checks for modern Bash, Node, Corepack, Python, Docker Compose, and Go Task. Include Intel and Apple Silicon path notes only where verified. Acceptance criteria: A contributor can confirm which Bash the scripts will use. The guide avoids replacing /bin/bash or editing protected system files. Commands do not assume paid providers or production configuration. The root README links the guide. A maintainer records the macOS version used for verification in the PR. Effort: S Verification: command -v bash bash --version task doctor Out of scope: A native GUI installer or support for Bash 3.2.

📅 Opened Jul 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Why: The README identifies WSL2 as the Windows path but does not yet provide a focused troubleshooting runbook. Scope: Add docs/setup/windows-wsl2.md. Cover Docker Desktop WSL integration, Linux-filesystem clone location, line endings, port conflicts, and checking Compose availability. Show only diagnostic commands that do not reveal environment values. Link the guide from the README and setup issue form if the issue-form schema supports the link cleanly. Acceptance criteria: The guide distinguishes WSL2 from native PowerShell. Commands are tested in an Ubuntu WSL2 shell. The guide explains when not to install a second Docker daemon. The guide includes a redaction warning before log-sharing instructions. All relative links pass the repository docs check, if available. Effort: S Verification: bash --version docker compose version task doctor Out of scope: Supporting native Windows orchestration or publishing Docker Desktop credentials.

📅 Opened Jul 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for allgpt-co/QuickVoice

When evaluating whether to contribute to allgpt-co/QuickVoice, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of allgpt-co/QuickVoice acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to allgpt-co/QuickVoice

01

Is allgpt-co/QuickVoice welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

allgpt-co/QuickVoice has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 59.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 59.2 places allgpt-co/QuickVoice in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for allgpt-co/QuickVoice?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in allgpt-co/QuickVoice?

Yes, allgpt-co/QuickVoice currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for allgpt-co/QuickVoice are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.