aio-libs/aiobotocore - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

asyncio support for botocore library using aiohttp

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 89%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is aio-libs/aiobotocore welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

aio-libs/aiobotocore has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in aio-libs/aiobotocore respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 67.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 67.2 places aio-libs/aiobotocore in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for aio-libs/aiobotocore?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for aio-libs/aiobotocore is 89.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in aio-libs/aiobotocore?

aio-libs/aiobotocore currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

aio-libs
aio-libs/aiobotocoreA•Welcoming1.4k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
aio-libs

aio-libs/aiobotocore

1,425
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(67/100)Python

asyncio support for botocore library using aiohttp

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
9.2/10
Patience Score
9.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in aio-libs/aiobotocore. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
89.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
6 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
89.3%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe66/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for aio-libs/aiobotocore
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/aio-libs/aiobotocore)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/aio-libs/aiobotocore?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

CautionThis is a popular topic of @webknjaz's rants 🤪 I checked the coverage presented on Codecov and noticed a few common mistakes in the coverage collection/configuration. Look at https://app.codecov.io/gh/aio-libs/aiobotocore/commit/fd5f917524ce98ce5b48b062f2d78815cebe60d6/tree?search=tests%2F&displayType=list and you'll see that the test folder has a bunch of dead code. This ain't good — this means that some tests you might think run don't. This kind of thing may happen when you copy a test but forget to rename the function and so the first one gets shadowed and never runs. Or some logic is bad in helpers. Some bits might be expected to never run and that's fine, however, having those line marked as red makes it harder to rely on the coverage data. And so it's recommended to require 100% coverage on the test folder. This is achievable by using line exclusions and "no cover", "no branch" pragmas that would make coveragepy ignore the lines you don't want to matter completely so

📅 Opened Mar 9, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for aio-libs/aiobotocore

When evaluating whether to contribute to aio-libs/aiobotocore, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of aio-libs/aiobotocore acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 89.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to aio-libs/aiobotocore

01

Is aio-libs/aiobotocore welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

aio-libs/aiobotocore has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 67.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 67.2 places aio-libs/aiobotocore in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for aio-libs/aiobotocore?

The external pull request merge rate is 89.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in aio-libs/aiobotocore?

Yes, aio-libs/aiobotocore currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for aio-libs/aiobotocore are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.