abundant-ai/swe-marathon - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

SWE-Marathon: an ultra long-horizon SWE benchmark

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 53/100

External PR Merge Rate: 73%

Response Time: 14d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is abundant-ai/swe-marathon welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

abundant-ai/swe-marathon has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in abundant-ai/swe-marathon respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 342.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 53.5 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 53.5 places abundant-ai/swe-marathon in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for abundant-ai/swe-marathon?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for abundant-ai/swe-marathon is 72.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in abundant-ai/swe-marathon?

abundant-ai/swe-marathon does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

abundant-ai
abundant-ai/swe-marathonB•Solid164
GitHub
Back to Explorer
abundant-ai

abundant-ai/swe-marathon

164
Active (30d)B•Solid(53/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

SWE-Marathon: an ultra long-horizon SWE benchmark

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Growing Rust project in abundant-ai/swe-marathon welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with Rust style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
14 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
72.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
72.7%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe59/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for abundant-ai/swe-marathon
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/abundant-ai/swe-marathon)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/abundant-ai/swe-marathon?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for abundant-ai/swe-marathon.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for abundant-ai/swe-marathon

When evaluating whether to contribute to abundant-ai/swe-marathon, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of abundant-ai/swe-marathon acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 14 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 72.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to abundant-ai/swe-marathon

01

Is abundant-ai/swe-marathon welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

abundant-ai/swe-marathon has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~14 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 53.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 53.5 places abundant-ai/swe-marathon in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for abundant-ai/swe-marathon?

The external pull request merge rate is 72.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in abundant-ai/swe-marathon?

abundant-ai/swe-marathon does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for abundant-ai/swe-marathon are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.