abrignoni/ALEAPP - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Android Logs Events And Protobuf Parser

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 70/100

External PR Merge Rate: 95%

Response Time: 9d

First Timer Success: 91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is abrignoni/ALEAPP welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

abrignoni/ALEAPP has a recorded first-timer success rate of 90.9%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in abrignoni/ALEAPP respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 211.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 70.3 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 70.3 places abrignoni/ALEAPP in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for abrignoni/ALEAPP?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for abrignoni/ALEAPP is 95.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in abrignoni/ALEAPP?

abrignoni/ALEAPP currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

abrignoni
abrignoni/ALEAPPSElite887
GitHub
Back to Explorer
abrignoni

abrignoni/ALEAPP

887
SElite(70/100)Python

Android Logs Events And Protobuf Parser

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.7/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Highly welcoming maintainers in abrignoni/ALEAPP. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
8 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
95.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
90.9%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
13 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
95.3%
Merge Gauge
90.9%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe65/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for abrignoni/ALEAPP
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/abrignoni/ALEAPP)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/abrignoni/ALEAPP?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Same effort as the iLEAPP side (see iLEAPP #1645/#1647/#1648 and ALEAPP #925, #926, #927). Every conversation view we shipped had its direction column verified against real test images first. These are the artifacts still waiting, each blocked on either test data or a small design question: Teams (teams.py) - The local user appears to be derivable by matching UserPreferences.tenantId to the User.mri cid, but that format assumption is fragile and our current test data is thin (32 rows, mostly call logs). Needs a Teams extraction with actual back and forth chat and a known account owner. GroupMe (groupMe.py) - The messages are all there, but the local user id lives in the app's shared_prefs XML which the artifact doesn't currently collect. Needs a paths addition plus a test extraction that includes the prefs file so we can verify. TextNow (textnow.py) - Direction exists, but there is a mismatch between the SQL (which selects a thread_id) and the emitted headers. Needs a careful colum

📅 Opened Jul 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for abrignoni/ALEAPP

When evaluating whether to contribute to abrignoni/ALEAPP, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of abrignoni/ALEAPP acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 8 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 95.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to abrignoni/ALEAPP

01

Is abrignoni/ALEAPP welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

abrignoni/ALEAPP has a recorded first-timer success rate of 90.9%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~8 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 70.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 70.3 places abrignoni/ALEAPP in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for abrignoni/ALEAPP?

The external pull request merge rate is 95.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in abrignoni/ALEAPP?

Yes, abrignoni/ALEAPP currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for abrignoni/ALEAPP are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.