WildMeOrg/Wildbook - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Wild Me's first product, Wildbook supports researchers by allowing collaboration across the globe and automation of photo ID matching

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 57/100

External PR Merge Rate: 73%

Response Time: 5d

First Timer Success: 20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is WildMeOrg/Wildbook welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

WildMeOrg/Wildbook has a recorded first-timer success rate of 20.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in WildMeOrg/Wildbook respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 126.4 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 56.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 56.8 places WildMeOrg/Wildbook in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for WildMeOrg/Wildbook?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for WildMeOrg/Wildbook is 73.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in WildMeOrg/Wildbook?

WildMeOrg/Wildbook currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

WildMeOrg
WildMeOrg/WildbookA•Welcoming143
GitHub
Back to Explorer
WildMeOrg

WildMeOrg/Wildbook

143
InactiveA•Welcoming(57/100)Java

Wild Me's first product, Wildbook supports researchers by allowing collaboration across the globe and automation of photo ID matching

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Community Mentor

Warmth Score
9.8/10
Patience Score
9.6/10
Nitpick Rate
10%

Highly encouraging & supportive maintainers (100% positive review sentiment). Active code reviews with constructive guidance for new contributors in WildMeOrg/Wildbook.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
5 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
73.2%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
20.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
5 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
73.2%
Merge Gauge
20.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe35/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for WildMeOrg/Wildbook
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/WildMeOrg/Wildbook)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/WildMeOrg/Wildbook?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Expected behavior Users can delete the default "12" from the Number of results field on the match page (/react/match-results) and enter their own value. Current behavior If a user tries to delete the "12" from the field before typing a new value, the 1 still remains. Workaround is to highlight the number and then type over the highlighted text. QA notes Replicated in Edge, Firefox, Chrome, Brave, and Safari.

📅 Opened Aug 31, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Expected behavior When you click the Edit button on an Individual page (individuals.jsp) one of the available fields to edit is the taxonomy. Current behavior Taxonomy is the only metadata field on the Individual page that can't be edited. Even if the associated encounters have been updated with the correct taxonomy, the individual page will only display the original one. Examples: https://giraffespotter.org/individuals.jsp?id=98fefafb-2fd7-4cf4-895f-52a7b6e0657e https://giraffespotter.org/individuals.jsp?id=a1b900a1-c9d1-4f6b-8a3f-8c86a7dfa15b QA notes This does not appear to be a new bug, just a design flaw. Older versions of Wildbook (like Seadragon) behave the same way. May need to be rolled up as part of Individual page redesign. Community link Reported by ZCP via email to @goddesswarship 8/11/26

📅 Opened Aug 11, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for WildMeOrg/Wildbook

When evaluating whether to contribute to WildMeOrg/Wildbook, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of WildMeOrg/Wildbook acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 73.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to WildMeOrg/Wildbook

01

Is WildMeOrg/Wildbook welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

WildMeOrg/Wildbook has a recorded first-timer success rate of 20.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 56.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 56.8 places WildMeOrg/Wildbook in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for WildMeOrg/Wildbook?

The external pull request merge rate is 73.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in WildMeOrg/Wildbook?

Yes, WildMeOrg/Wildbook currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for WildMeOrg/Wildbook are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.