WeblateOrg/weblate - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Web based localization tool with tight version control integration.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 90%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is WeblateOrg/weblate welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

WeblateOrg/weblate has a recorded first-timer success rate of 61.5%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in WeblateOrg/weblate respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 69.2 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 69.2 places WeblateOrg/weblate in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for WeblateOrg/weblate?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for WeblateOrg/weblate is 90.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in WeblateOrg/weblate?

WeblateOrg/weblate currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

WeblateOrg
WeblateOrg/weblateS•Elite6.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
WeblateOrg

WeblateOrg/weblate

6,110
Active (30d)S•Elite(69/100)Python

Web based localization tool with tight version control integration.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in WeblateOrg/weblate. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
90.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
61.5%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
26 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
90.0%
Merge Gauge
61.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe54/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for WeblateOrg/weblate
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/WeblateOrg/weblate)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/WeblateOrg/weblate?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Describe the issue In badges/shields#11783, a blurred shadow was added behind the text of badges to improve their WCAG contrast score, so they now look like: in contrast to Weblate's badges that still replicate their previous style: I already tried I've read and searched the documentation. I've searched for similar filed issues in this repository. Steps to reproduce the behavior . Expected behavior No response Screenshots No response Exception traceback How do you run Weblate? No response Weblate version reproduced in Hosted Weblate Weblate deploy checks Additional context No response

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Describe the problem Codeberg's Weblate instance currently runs a slightly modified version of Weblate. Since the introduction of the new release convention there's been more releases and requires more effort every so often to update Weblate and this amount of effort is now so high it's better to get rid of this small modification and hopefully get it in supported by Weblate. The modification is quite simple, Codeberg's weblate is only accessible via OAuth2 of codeberg.org. However due to the email privacy, the email returned can be [email protected] and Forgejo does not recognize the noreply email for it's avatar via email hash route. Hence we use the avatar via username route which is always available. Solution brainstorm A setting to choose the method of fetching the avatar, e.g. md5email or username. Describe alternatives you have considered Running a soft-fork of Weblate, this however costs a lot of time. Screenshots N/A Additional context N/A

📅 Opened Sep 17, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Describe the problem The Anthropic machinery sends the system prompt as a plain string, without any cache_control block. Anthropic's prompt caching is opt-in, so nothing gets cached at all right now. The system prompt built in BaseLLMTranslation (persona + style + language instructions + the JSON schema boilerplate) is identical for every request to a given target language. With a longer style guide it easily reaches 2-3k tokens. When automatic translation runs over a few thousand strings, that same prefix is billed at full input price on every single request. In our setup (~3.4k strings per language, ~8KB style prompt) this repeated prefix is the majority of the MT spend. Solution brainstorm Send the system prompt as a content block with a cache breakpoint in weblate/machinery/anthropic.py: "system": [ {"type": "text", "text": prompt, "cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"}}, ], Cached reads are billed at roughly 10% of the normal input price with a 5 minute sliding TTL, which fits

📅 Opened Aug 25, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Describe the problem In Godot Engine's class reference, we make great use of BBCode to format text. A lot of go beyond the standard [b], [i], [code] tags and require additional parameters. For example, the [url] tag can optionally accept a link, formatted as [url=https://github.com/WeblateOrg]. Our custom [codeblock] tag can also accept a language, formatted as [codeblock lang=csharp]. Unfortunately, the "highlighting" and "error reporting" systems cannot detect these tags. This can make it quite awkward to change several strings. BBCode-related changes are harder to spot, tags may be mistyped or missing in translations, shortcuts such as CTRL + number key to quickly insert tags do not work. Solution brainstorm I believe what mostly needs to change is this regex in this repository: weblate/weblate/checks/markup.py Lines 76 to 78 in 2b4eab3 BBCODE_MATCH = re.compile(

📅 Opened Aug 14, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Describe the problem The keyword option in gettext can be defined multiple times to define more keywords. The addon currently only allows defining one additional keyword. Solution brainstorm Allow defining a list of keywords and add the --keyword option for each of these keywords. Describe alternatives you have considered No response Screenshots No response Additional context weblate/weblate/addons/gettext.py Line 1123 in 03f08b9 result.append(f"--keyword={keyword}") I can try implementing this if desired.

📅 Opened Aug 12, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for WeblateOrg/weblate

When evaluating whether to contribute to WeblateOrg/weblate, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of WeblateOrg/weblate acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 90.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to WeblateOrg/weblate

01

Is WeblateOrg/weblate welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

WeblateOrg/weblate has a recorded first-timer success rate of 61.5%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 69.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 69.2 places WeblateOrg/weblate in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for WeblateOrg/weblate?

The external pull request merge rate is 90.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in WeblateOrg/weblate?

Yes, WeblateOrg/weblate currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for WeblateOrg/weblate are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.