Vigil-SOC/vigil - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Vigil: the open source AI SOC (agentic SOC). 13 specialized AI agents, 30+ MCP integrations, 7,200+ detection rules. Apache 2.0.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 62/100

External PR Merge Rate: 67%

Response Time: 14h

First Timer Success: 60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Vigil-SOC/vigil welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Vigil-SOC/vigil has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Vigil-SOC/vigil respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 13.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 61.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 61.5 places Vigil-SOC/vigil in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Vigil-SOC/vigil?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Vigil-SOC/vigil is 66.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Vigil-SOC/vigil?

Vigil-SOC/vigil currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Vigil-SOC
Vigil-SOC/vigilAWelcoming261
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Vigil-SOC

Vigil-SOC/vigil

261
AWelcoming(62/100)Python

Vigil: the open source AI SOC (agentic SOC). 13 specialized AI agents, 30+ MCP integrations, 7,200+ detection rules. Apache 2.0.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Growing Python project in Vigil-SOC/vigil welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with Python style conventions
  • Keep PRs scoped and well-documented
  • Include relevant test coverage for changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
13 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
66.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
60.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
14 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
66.7%
Merge Gauge
60.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe64/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Vigil-SOC/vigil
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Vigil-SOC/vigil)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Vigil-SOC/vigil?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Follow-up to #643. That issue specified the daemon and API process boundaries and #685 implemented them; llm-worker is the third deployable and was never in scope. See #643 for the shared background on why fail-fast is the behavior we're keeping. Background #685 added core.config.validate_settings_or_exit() and called it at two process boundaries, so a malformed env value now produces a single configuration error: <field>: <reason> line on stderr and exits os.EX_CONFIG (78) instead of a ValidationError traceback from whatever code happened to read config first. services/worker did not get the same treatment. Per CLAUDE.md, services/ holds "exactly api, daemon, worker" — so two of three deployables now fail cleanly and the third still fails the old way: DAEMON_HEALTH_PORT=not-an-int python -m services.worker → pydantic ValidationError traceback, exit 1 The trace surfaces at core/llm/defaults.py:16, reached through the import-time get_settings() at services/worker/jobs.py:16 — one

📅 Opened Aug 17, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Summary docker/docker-compose.yml publishes PostgreSQL, Redis and the Bifrost gateway on 0.0.0.0, so all three are reachable from anywhere on the operator's network. For a SOC platform this is worth tightening — the machine running Vigil holds security findings, case data and LLM credentials. Tested on v0.4.0 (8abecc2). Current behaviour $ docker ps --format '{{.Names}}\t{{.Ports}}' deeptempo-postgres 0.0.0.0:5432->5432/tcp, [::]:5432->5432/tcp deeptempo-redis 0.0.0.0:6379->6379/tcp, [::]:6379->6379/tcp deeptempo-bifrost 0.0.0.0:8080->8080/tcp, [::]:8080->8080/tcp From docker/docker-compose.yml: line 13 — - "5432:5432" line 33 — - "6379:6379" line 207 — - "8080:8080" Why each one matters Postgres ships with POSTGRES_PASSWORD: ${POSTGRES_PASSWORD:-deeptempo_secure_password_change_me}. The default is in the repo, so an install that hasn't overridden it is open to anyone on the LAN. It holds findings, cases, approval_actions and llm_provider_configs. Redis runs with n

📅 Opened Aug 8, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Summary A custom OpenAI-compatible provider (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, vLLM, Together) can be registered in the UI, passes the connection test, and still never routes: every completion fails with no keys found that support model: <model>. Bifrost stays pointed at api.openai.com. Root cause is two stacked defects in services/bifrost_admin.py. The second one is broader than the title suggests — it silently disables all runtime sync to Bifrost, keys included. Tested on v0.4.0 (8abecc2) with maximhq/bifrost:latest. Defect A — base_url is never propagated bifrost_admin.py syncs the key value (push_provider_key) and the model allow-list (sync_provider_models). Neither touches network_config.base_url. LLMProviderConfig.base_url is read — _do_sync_all_provider_models puts "base_url": row.base_url into the row dict at services/bifrost_admin.py:309 — but it is only used to feed model discovery and the connection test, both of which call the upstream directly. That's why the test passes while

📅 Opened Aug 8, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Coding: Low · Vigil context: Med · Lane: backend · Type: investigation, not migration investigations.trigger_ids is annotated Mapped[List[dict]] (database/models.py:2000) but is used as though it holds a list of ids — daemon/orchestrator.py:950 does trigger_ids = inv.trigger_ids or [] and :1167 passes inv_record.get("trigger_ids", []) straight through. The annotation and the usage disagree, so the ORM type cannot be trusted here. That is the finding. Until it is resolved, nobody can say whether this column belongs with the scalar-array promotions or the child-table ones. No migration in this issue. The deliverable is an answer. Acceptance criteria Identify every writer and record the actual element type — from code that constructs the elements, not from a pass-through. Sample real rows if any environment has them, and say which environment. Correct the Mapped[...] annotation to match reality. That alone is worth the PR. State the verdict: ARRAY(TEXT) of finding ids, a join tabl

📅 Opened Aug 4, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Vigil-SOC/vigil

When evaluating whether to contribute to Vigil-SOC/vigil, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Vigil-SOC/vigil acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 13 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 66.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Vigil-SOC/vigil

01

Is Vigil-SOC/vigil welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Vigil-SOC/vigil has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~13 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 61.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 61.5 places Vigil-SOC/vigil in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Vigil-SOC/vigil?

The external pull request merge rate is 66.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Vigil-SOC/vigil?

Yes, Vigil-SOC/vigil currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Vigil-SOC/vigil are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.