TaceoLabs/co-snarks - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Tooling for creating collaborative SNARKs for Circom and Noir circuits.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 81%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: 83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TaceoLabs/co-snarks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

TaceoLabs/co-snarks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in TaceoLabs/co-snarks respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 70.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 59.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 59.4 places TaceoLabs/co-snarks in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for TaceoLabs/co-snarks?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for TaceoLabs/co-snarks is 81.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in TaceoLabs/co-snarks?

TaceoLabs/co-snarks does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

TaceoLabs
TaceoLabs/co-snarksAWelcoming230
GitHub
Back to Explorer
TaceoLabs

TaceoLabs/co-snarks

230
AWelcoming(59/100)Rust

Tooling for creating collaborative SNARKs for Circom and Noir circuits.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.1/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in TaceoLabs/co-snarks. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
81.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
83.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
81.3%
Merge Gauge
83.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe58/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for TaceoLabs/co-snarks
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/TaceoLabs/co-snarks)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/TaceoLabs/co-snarks?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for TaceoLabs/co-snarks.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for TaceoLabs/co-snarks

When evaluating whether to contribute to TaceoLabs/co-snarks, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of TaceoLabs/co-snarks acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 81.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to TaceoLabs/co-snarks

01

Is TaceoLabs/co-snarks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

TaceoLabs/co-snarks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 59.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 59.4 places TaceoLabs/co-snarks in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for TaceoLabs/co-snarks?

The external pull request merge rate is 81.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in TaceoLabs/co-snarks?

TaceoLabs/co-snarks does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for TaceoLabs/co-snarks are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.