SudoHopeX/KaliGPT - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

KaliGPT: an Agentic AI (built with Gemini, ChatGPT, Ollama, OpenRouter Models) fine tuned for ethical hackers & students in offensive security making workflows smarter, faster, and more accessible.

C-Rank Grade: C (Moderate) - 38/100

External PR Merge Rate: 33%

Response Time: 11d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SudoHopeX/KaliGPT welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

SudoHopeX/KaliGPT has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked C typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in SudoHopeX/KaliGPT respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 263.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 37.6 C-Rank™ score (C Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 37.6 places SudoHopeX/KaliGPT in the C tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for SudoHopeX/KaliGPT?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for SudoHopeX/KaliGPT is 33.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in SudoHopeX/KaliGPT?

SudoHopeX/KaliGPT currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

SudoHopeX
SudoHopeX/KaliGPTC•Moderate604
GitHub
Back to Explorer
SudoHopeX

SudoHopeX/KaliGPT

604
InactiveC•Moderate(38/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

KaliGPT: an Agentic AI (built with Gemini, ChatGPT, Ollama, OpenRouter Models) fine tuned for ethical hackers & students in offensive security making workflows smarter, faster, and more accessible.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Community Mentor

Warmth Score
9.8/10
Patience Score
9.6/10
Nitpick Rate
10%

Highly encouraging & supportive maintainers (100% positive review sentiment). Active code reviews with constructive guidance for new contributors in SudoHopeX/KaliGPT.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Verify all existing package test suites run cleanly
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
10 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
33.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
33.3%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe13/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for SudoHopeX/KaliGPT
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/SudoHopeX/KaliGPT)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/SudoHopeX/KaliGPT?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

I think we need to add an API URL option, for example, to use 9router.

📅 Opened Jun 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Summary The current implementation of openai_tool_adapter() generates an outdated tool schema that is incompatible with the latest OpenAI tool‑calling specification. Specifically, the adapter nests name, description, and parameters inside a "function" object. However, OpenAI now requires these fields at the top level of each tool definition. This mismatch results in the following API error: Missing required parameter: 'tools[0].name' Steps to Reproduce Generate tool schemas using the existing openai_tool_adapter() implementation. Pass the generated tools into the OpenAI API via client.responses.create(). Observe the returned error. Actual Behavior The API returns: Error code: 400 {'error': { 'message': "Missing required parameter: 'tools[0].name'.", 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param': 'tools[0].name', 'code': 'missing_required_parameter' }} Root Cause The adapter outputs this incorrect structure: { "type": "function", "function": { "name": "...",

📅 Opened Mar 27, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 45/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for SudoHopeX/KaliGPT

When evaluating whether to contribute to SudoHopeX/KaliGPT, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of SudoHopeX/KaliGPT acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 10 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 33.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to SudoHopeX/KaliGPT

01

Is SudoHopeX/KaliGPT welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

SudoHopeX/KaliGPT has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Moderate typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~10 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 37.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 37.6 places SudoHopeX/KaliGPT in the Moderate tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for SudoHopeX/KaliGPT?

The external pull request merge rate is 33.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in SudoHopeX/KaliGPT?

Yes, SudoHopeX/KaliGPT currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for SudoHopeX/KaliGPT are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.