SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Workbench for biodiversity informatics.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 55/100

External PR Merge Rate: 75%

Response Time: 1h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 1.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 55.1 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 55.1 places SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks is 75.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks?

SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

SpeciesFileGroup
SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworksB•Solid115
GitHub
Back to Explorer
SpeciesFileGroup

SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks

115
Active (30d)B•Solid(55/100)Ruby

Workbench for biodiversity informatics.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
1 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
75.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
11 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
75.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe59/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Ruby beginner tasks?Explore Ruby GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks

When evaluating whether to contribute to SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 75.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks

01

Is SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 55.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 55.1 places SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks?

The external pull request merge rate is 75.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks?

SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.