Sma1lboy/rove - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Rove — the agent multiplexer for your terminal. Run coding agents on parallel tasks with isolated worktrees and persistent sessions.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 62/100

External PR Merge Rate: 68%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sma1lboy/rove welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Sma1lboy/rove has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Sma1lboy/rove respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 61.7 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 61.7 places Sma1lboy/rove in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Sma1lboy/rove?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Sma1lboy/rove is 67.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Sma1lboy/rove?

Sma1lboy/rove does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

Sma1lboy
Sma1lboy/roveA•Welcoming171
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Sma1lboy

Sma1lboy/rove

171
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(62/100)TypeScript

Rove — the agent multiplexer for your terminal. Run coding agents on parallel tasks with isolated worktrees and persistent sessions.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
6.9/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Strict review standards in Sma1lboy/rove. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in Sma1lboy/rove focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR
  • •Call out API, migration, or compatibility impact clearly

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not open context-free PRs
  • •Do not hide breaking changes in implementation details
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
67.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
67.7%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe47/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Sma1lboy/rove
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Sma1lboy/rove)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Sma1lboy/rove?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Repro On Windows, start kobe and let a task's engine session come up (Claude Code, Codex, …). While the engine is mid-response, run kobe reset — or archive/delete the task, or let the PTY host idle-exit. Reopen the task and read the transcript. Expected vs actual Expected: the engine gets what it gets on macOS/Linux — a SIGTERM, 500 ms to flush its transcript, and only then a hard kill. Actual: it is terminated instantly with no chance to flush, so the tail of the conversation can be missing when the task is resumed. Why Windows has no POSIX signals, and the kill path collapses to a hard kill at the very first step: packages/kobe-daemon/src/daemon/pty-host.ts:494 — signalProcessGroup() guards the process-group signal with process.platform !== "win32", so on Windows it goes straight to the fallback. packages/kobe-daemon/src/daemon/pty-driver.ts:110 — that fallback is the node-pty driver's kill: () => child.kill(). node-pty ignores the signal argument on Windows and calls

📅 Opened Jul 26, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Sma1lboy/rove

When evaluating whether to contribute to Sma1lboy/rove, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Sma1lboy/rove acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 67.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Sma1lboy/rove

01

Is Sma1lboy/rove welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Sma1lboy/rove has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 61.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 61.7 places Sma1lboy/rove in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Sma1lboy/rove?

The external pull request merge rate is 67.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Sma1lboy/rove?

Sma1lboy/rove does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Sma1lboy/rove are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.