SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Tool-calling quality benchmark for LLM serving stacks. 80+ deterministic scenarios testing multi-turn orchestration, safety boundaries, and structured output. Supports vLLM, SGLang, and llama.cpp.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 50/100

External PR Merge Rate: 20%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 30.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 50.2 C-Rankâ„¢ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 50.2 places SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench is 20.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench?

SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

SeraphimSerapis
SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-benchB•Solid304
GitHub
Back to Explorer
SeraphimSerapis

SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench

304
B•Solid(50/100)Python

Tool-calling quality benchmark for LLM serving stacks. 80+ deterministic scenarios testing multi-turn orchestration, safety boundaries, and structured output. Supports vLLM, SGLang, and llama.cpp.

Compare•
Jump to:
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
20.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
20.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe15/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench

When evaluating whether to contribute to SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 20.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench

01

Is SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 50.2 C-Rankâ„¢ score represent?

The C-Rankâ„¢ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 50.2 places SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench?

The external pull request merge rate is 20.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench?

SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rankâ„¢ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for SeraphimSerapis/tool-eval-bench are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.