ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Doctrine DQL functions for SQL JSON data type

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 61/100

External PR Merge Rate: 80%

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.6 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.6 places ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions is 80.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions?

ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

ScientaNL
ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctionsB•Solid593
GitHub
Back to Explorer
ScientaNL

ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions

593
Active (30d)B•Solid(61/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)PHP

Doctrine DQL functions for SQL JSON data type

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Strict review standards in ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR
  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not open context-free PRs
  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
80.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
80.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe92/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

PostgreSQL support is thin. The library ships 11 functions and operators. The comparable package martin-georgiev/postgresql-for-doctrine ships more than 40. Missing operators: Operator Meaning ? key exists ?& all keys exist ?| any key exists @? JSON path exists #- delete at path Missing path functions: JSONB_PATH_EXISTS, JSONB_PATH_MATCH, JSONB_PATH_QUERY, JSONB_PATH_QUERY_ARRAY, JSONB_PATH_QUERY_FIRST. Missing aggregation: JSON_AGG, JSONB_AGG, JSON_OBJECT_AGG, JSONB_OBJECT_AGG. Missing build and inspect helpers: JSON_BUILD_ARRAY, JSON_BUILD_OBJECT, JSONB_BUILD_ARRAY, JSONB_BUILD_OBJECT, JSONB_ARRAY_LENGTH, JSONB_TYPEOF, JSONB_PRETTY, JSONB_STRIP_NULLS, JSONB_ARRAY_ELEMENTS, JSONB_ARRAY_ELEMENTS_TEXT. Each function needs a node, a unit test, an integration test and a README row. The work splits cleanly, so several people can take separate groups. JSONB_SET is tracked on its own because demand for it is much higher. Some path functions need PostgreSQL 12 or later. Stat

📅 Opened Sep 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more PHP beginner tasks?Explore PHP GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions

When evaluating whether to contribute to ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 80.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions

01

Is ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.6 places ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions?

The external pull request merge rate is 80.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions?

Yes, ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for ScientaNL/DoctrineJsonFunctions are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.