RoboSats/robosats - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A simple and private bitcoin exchange

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 66%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is RoboSats/robosats welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

RoboSats/robosats has a recorded first-timer success rate of 42.9%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in RoboSats/robosats respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 46.4 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.5 places RoboSats/robosats in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for RoboSats/robosats?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for RoboSats/robosats is 66.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in RoboSats/robosats?

RoboSats/robosats currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

RoboSats
RoboSats/robosatsA•Welcoming1.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
RoboSats

RoboSats/robosats

1,029
InactiveA•Welcoming(60/100)Python

A simple and private bitcoin exchange

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active Python repository in RoboSats/robosats with ongoing community development and issue triage.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with Python style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
66.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
42.9%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
18 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
66.0%
Merge Gauge
42.9%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe39/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for RoboSats/robosats
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/RoboSats/robosats)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/RoboSats/robosats?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

I cloned main and counted how stale the locale files are against en.json. They all still have the full set of keys, but a good chunk is left in English. Catalan is the worst at ~76%, most languages sit around 84–86%, and even the most complete one (Czech) still has ~70 English strings. You can see it in de.json with things like Claim Rewards, Swap In/Swap Out, and You need to enable nostr to receive notifications. They're translated by hand, and translations aren't in the reward pool, so I don't think that backlog closes on its own. I help maintain Bisq's localization tooling (localize-pipeline), and I could set up a workflow that picks up the changed keys whenever en.json changes and opens a PR for review. It stays off until someone adds a model key, it never merges by itself, and it can run against a local model so nothing leaves your servers. It already handles the i18next {{…}} variables and leaves the #N marker keys alone. Before I build anything: is this something you'd want?

📅 Opened Jul 1, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Describe the bug The settings panel includes a toggle to render QR codes in "Dark" mode when the app theme is set to dark. Dark QR codes on a dark background lack sufficient contrast to meet the QR spec (ISO/IEC 18004) and are frequently unreadable by scanner apps. It's also very annoying to have to constantly turn this off on every trade. To Reproduce Go to Settings Toggle app theme to Dark A second toggle appears for QR code colour — switch it to Dark Attempt to scan any QR code in the app — scanner will fail to read it Expected behavior QR codes should always render with a light background regardless of the app theme. The dark QR toggle should be removed. Screenshots N/A Desktop N/A — this is a UI/functional issue reproducible across all platforms Smartphone N/A — same as above Additional context The QR light/dark toggle is conditionally rendered in frontend/src/components/SettingsForm/index.tsx when settings.mode === 'dark'. The fix would be to remove the QRs setting entire

📅 Opened May 15, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 45/100Contribute

Describe the bug "Sell orders" are shown instead of "Swap out" orders, when the user clicks on "SWAP OUT OF LN". To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Start a new session Create a new robot On the following page, click on "SWAP OUT OF LN" The list of offers is shown, the table shows the columns and labels for "Swap out", but the listed orders are actually "sell orders": Expected behavior The list of offers should show "Swap out orders". Desktop (please complete the following information): OS: Ubuntu 24.04 Browser TorBrowser Version 15.0.7

📅 Opened Mar 13, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Hi While integrating the RoboSats coordinator API, I noticed the following behavior. curl -i --socks5-hostname 127.0.0.1:9050 \ "http://otmoonrndnrddqdlhu6b36heunmbyw3cgvadqo2oqeau3656wfv7fwad.onion/api/book/?format=json&currency=2&type=1" HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found Content-Type: application/json {"not_found":"No orders found, be the first to make one"} Is returning HTTP 404 in the “no orders” case intentional? From a client perspective, this makes it harder to distinguish between: a healthy coordinator with an empty book a real endpoint / coordinator error Would returning 200 OK with an empty array (or a structured response) be acceptable for this case? Happy to adapt client-side either way, just looking for clarification on the intended semantics. Thanks!

📅 Opened Feb 5, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Describe When selecting any language (FR, ES, or PT) from the language dropdown, the page content does not change and remains in English. Only the URL changes (for example, /fr/ or /es/), but the visible text (hero section, buttons, and navigation items) is still displayed in English. This makes the language switcher misleading and non-functional. To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Go to https://learn.robosats.org Click on the language dropdown in the top-right corner. Select any language (FR, ES, or PT). Observe that the URL changes but the page content remains in English. Expected behavior When a language is selected, all visible UI text (hero section, buttons, and navigation items) should be translated into the chosen language. If translations are not available, the UI should clearly indicate that the selected language is not supported instead of silently showing English. Screenshots Desktop (please complete the following information): OS: Linux Browser: Chrome Version:

📅 Opened Feb 1, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for RoboSats/robosats

When evaluating whether to contribute to RoboSats/robosats, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of RoboSats/robosats acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 66.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to RoboSats/robosats

01

Is RoboSats/robosats welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

RoboSats/robosats has a recorded first-timer success rate of 42.9%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.5 places RoboSats/robosats in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for RoboSats/robosats?

The external pull request merge rate is 66.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in RoboSats/robosats?

Yes, RoboSats/robosats currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for RoboSats/robosats are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.