RaspAP/raspap-webgui - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The easiest, full-featured wireless router setup for Debian-based devices. Period.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 29/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is RaspAP/raspap-webgui welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

RaspAP/raspap-webgui has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in RaspAP/raspap-webgui respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 29.5 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 29.5 places RaspAP/raspap-webgui in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for RaspAP/raspap-webgui?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for RaspAP/raspap-webgui is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in RaspAP/raspap-webgui?

RaspAP/raspap-webgui currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

RaspAP
RaspAP/raspap-webguiDRisky5.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
RaspAP

RaspAP/raspap-webgui

5,214
DRisky(29/100)PHP

The easiest, full-featured wireless router setup for Debian-based devices. Period.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in RaspAP/raspap-webgui welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe30/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for RaspAP/raspap-webgui
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/RaspAP/raspap-webgui)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/RaspAP/raspap-webgui?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Feature request RaspAP currently supports uploading OpenVPN .ovpn client configuration files and, when needed, entering username/password credentials. It also supports certificate-based authentication using .ovpn files that include CA certificates, client certificates, and client private keys. However, there does not appear to be a field or option in the OpenVPN UI to provide a private key password/passphrase when the uploaded .ovpn configuration contains an encrypted private key. Current behavior When an .ovpn file includes an encrypted private key that requires a passphrase, RaspAP provides no way to enter or store that private key password from the OpenVPN configuration page. As a result, these otherwise valid OpenVPN client configurations cannot be used through the RaspAP UI. Expected behavior RaspAP should allow users to provide a private key password/passphrase for OpenVPN profiles that require one. Possible approaches could include: Adding an optional Private key password field

📅 Opened May 5, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? I was not sure to be connected correctly to internet. As I have no visual input, I need to manually connect to the device. Describe the solution you'd like I connect a simple RGB led to pin 17, 27, 22. I see when I can reach a website. Additional context I run the following script using python import time import socket import RPi.GPIO as GPIO from typing import Tuple HOST: str = "www.google.com" PORT: int = 443 TIMEOUT: float = 2.0 PINS: Tuple[int, int, int] = (17, 27, 22) # R, G, B GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM) for pin in PINS: GPIO.setup(pin, GPIO.OUT) pwm = [GPIO.PWM(pin, 1000) for pin in PINS] for p in pwm: p.start(100) # OFF (common anode) def set_color(r: int, g: int, b: int) -> None: pwm[0].ChangeDutyCycle(100 - r) pwm[1].ChangeDutyCycle(100 - g) pwm[2].ChangeDutyCycle(100 - b) def is_up(host: str, port: int) -> bool: try: with socket.create_connection((host, port), timeout=TIMEOUT): retur

📅 Opened May 5, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? It would be great to have an integration for Netbird (https://netbird.io) — a service similar to Tailscale. The service is using WireGuard and would make it easy to connect to your own network when using RaspAP

📅 Opened Feb 20, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? My goal is to immitate the function of a traditional router. Using eth0 (pi port) as the WAN port and wlan0 (pi wifi) and/or potential additional wireless and ethernet interfaces, likely via usb, as LAN interfaces. From my personal research this would require a bridge (br0) to allow the same subnet and dhcp like a traditional router. To get this outcome right now I'm required to create and modify files manually, potentially causing issues on the web interface as well as not being able to change things from the web ui. Describe the solution you'd like A UI to enable the "Multi LAN Interfaces" feature which would create a bridge but keep the DHCP and everything as usual. A configure UI which would allow you to select which interfaces you want to be part of said bridge and be LAN interfaces. Due to the nature of USB dongles, configured LAN interfaces may not be available after a boot or might be new. An ease of use feature would be a cache of

📅 Opened Feb 8, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...] I want to use pihole with raspap Describe the solution you'd like A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. Have it where raspap can detect if port 53 is already taken and ask if you want to disable dnsmasqs own dns caching server Also check if port 80 is taken and if it is ask if it should override or choose a different port for the website (8443, 8080, 880) Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered. I set lighttpd to port 8080 and ran pihole installer again I also added to one of the conf files in /etc/dnsmasq.d a single line port=0 Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

📅 Opened Feb 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more PHP beginner tasks?Explore PHP GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for RaspAP/raspap-webgui

When evaluating whether to contribute to RaspAP/raspap-webgui, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of RaspAP/raspap-webgui acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to RaspAP/raspap-webgui

01

Is RaspAP/raspap-webgui welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

RaspAP/raspap-webgui has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 29.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 29.5 places RaspAP/raspap-webgui in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for RaspAP/raspap-webgui?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in RaspAP/raspap-webgui?

Yes, RaspAP/raspap-webgui currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for RaspAP/raspap-webgui are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.