RamenDR/ramen - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 61/100

External PR Merge Rate: 60%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: 54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is RamenDR/ramen welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

RamenDR/ramen has a recorded first-timer success rate of 53.8%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in RamenDR/ramen respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 69.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 61.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 61.1 places RamenDR/ramen in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for RamenDR/ramen?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for RamenDR/ramen is 60.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in RamenDR/ramen?

RamenDR/ramen currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

RamenDR
RamenDR/ramenA•Welcoming106
GitHub
Back to Explorer
RamenDR

RamenDR/ramen

106
InactiveA•Welcoming(61/100)Go

Open-source repository analyzed with precision C-Rank telemetry.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

High-Friction Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
5.0/10
Patience Score
6.0/10
Nitpick Rate
65%

Rigorous architecture standards (100% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in RamenDR/ramen.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
60.1%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
53.8%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
14 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
60.1%
Merge Gauge
53.8%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe40/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for RamenDR/ramen
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/RamenDR/ramen)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/RamenDR/ramen?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

We have repeated and fragile code that can be simplified using ptr.Equal: https://github.com/kubernetes/utils/blob/cf1189d6abe3/ptr/ptr.go#L65

📅 Opened Sep 22, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

We have two addons that manually pass --server-side=true to work around the annotation size limit with large CRDs: argocd - applicationsets.argoproj.io CRD (#2646) olm - clusterserviceversions.operators.coreos.com CRD (#2539) With client-side apply, kubectl stores the entire resource manifest in the kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration annotation for three-way merge diffs. Large CRDs exceed the 262144 bytes annotation size limit. Rather than adding this flag ad-hoc per addon, we should make server-side apply the default in our kubectl.apply() wrapper. Proposed API: def apply(*args, server_side=True, input=None, context=None, log=print): for arg in args: if "--server-side" in arg: raise ValueError("use server_side argument instead of --server-side flag") if server_side: args = ("--server-side=true",) + args _watch("apply", *args, input=input, context=context, log=log) Default to server_side=True for all apply calls Reject raw --serv

📅 Opened Jul 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Summary GitHub Actions workflows that do not declare an explicit permissions block inherit the repository-wide default token permissions, which are typically broad (e.g., contents: write). Following the principle of least privilege, each workflow and/or job should declare only the permissions it actually needs, and jobs that do not use GITHUB_TOKEN at all should set permissions: {}. Background This was identified during the review of PR #2598 (#2598), where the podman-maintenance job was flagged as missing an explicit permissions block. The maintainer noted that this applies broadly across all workflows in the repository. Work to be done Audit all workflow files under .github/workflows/ to determine which jobs/workflows use GITHUB_TOKEN and what permissions they actually require. Add explicit permissions blocks to every workflow (and/or job), granting only the minimum required scopes. Jobs that do not use GITHUB_TOKEN at all should set permissions: {}. Use restrictive permissions (rea

📅 Opened Jun 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Minikube 1.39.0 added --dns-server flag[1]. We can simplify the dns module using this option and keep only the code for detecting if we need to use dns servers. Remove drenv/minikube/dns.configure(), and use dns.is_managed_mac() to determine if we need to configure dns server. If we do add --dns-servers start flag with the dns.SERVERS. [1] kubernetes/minikube#23069

📅 Opened Jun 7, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Summary The actions/checkout steps across this repository's GitHub Actions workflows do not set persist-credentials: false. When credentials are persisted (the default), the GitHub token is written to the local git config and remains available to any subsequent steps or processes, which is an unnecessary exposure for jobs that do not require authenticated git operations. Suggested change Add persist-credentials: false to all actions/checkout steps in .github/workflows/ that do not require subsequent authenticated git operations. - name: Checkout source uses: actions/checkout@v6 with: persist-credentials: false References Raised while reviewing PR #2585 (comment: #2585 (comment)) Requested by @nirs /cc @nirs

📅 Opened Jun 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for RamenDR/ramen

When evaluating whether to contribute to RamenDR/ramen, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of RamenDR/ramen acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 60.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to RamenDR/ramen

01

Is RamenDR/ramen welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

RamenDR/ramen has a recorded first-timer success rate of 53.8%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 61.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 61.1 places RamenDR/ramen in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for RamenDR/ramen?

The external pull request merge rate is 60.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in RamenDR/ramen?

Yes, RamenDR/ramen currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for RamenDR/ramen are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.