QingJ01/Pebble - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A small yet beautiful email client.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 50/100

External PR Merge Rate: 86%

Response Time: 8d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is QingJ01/Pebble welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

QingJ01/Pebble has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in QingJ01/Pebble respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 202.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 49.6 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 49.6 places QingJ01/Pebble in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for QingJ01/Pebble?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for QingJ01/Pebble is 85.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in QingJ01/Pebble?

QingJ01/Pebble does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

QingJ01
QingJ01/PebbleBSolid561
GitHub
Back to Explorer
QingJ01

QingJ01/Pebble

561
BSolid(50/100)Rust

A small yet beautiful email client.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Mentor

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Responsive & active maintainer team in QingJ01/Pebble. Reviews pull requests with focus on project architectural goals.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
8 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
85.7%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
85.7%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe64/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for QingJ01/Pebble
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/QingJ01/Pebble)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/QingJ01/Pebble?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for QingJ01/Pebble.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for QingJ01/Pebble

When evaluating whether to contribute to QingJ01/Pebble, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of QingJ01/Pebble acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 8 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 85.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to QingJ01/Pebble

01

Is QingJ01/Pebble welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

QingJ01/Pebble has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~8 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 49.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 49.6 places QingJ01/Pebble in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for QingJ01/Pebble?

The external pull request merge rate is 85.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in QingJ01/Pebble?

QingJ01/Pebble does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for QingJ01/Pebble are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.