PyCQA/flake8-bugbear - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A plugin for Flake8 finding likely bugs and design problems in your program. Contains warnings that don't belong in pyflakes and pycodestyle.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 78%

Response Time: 16h

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PyCQA/flake8-bugbear welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

PyCQA/flake8-bugbear has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in PyCQA/flake8-bugbear respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 16.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.4 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.4 places PyCQA/flake8-bugbear in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for PyCQA/flake8-bugbear?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for PyCQA/flake8-bugbear is 77.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in PyCQA/flake8-bugbear?

PyCQA/flake8-bugbear currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

PyCQA
PyCQA/flake8-bugbearB•Solid1.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
PyCQA

PyCQA/flake8-bugbear

1,115
Active (30d)B•Solid(63/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

A plugin for Flake8 finding likely bugs and design problems in your program. Contains warnings that don't belong in pyflakes and pycodestyle.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in PyCQA/flake8-bugbear welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
15 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
77.8%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
9 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
77.8%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe69/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for PyCQA/flake8-bugbear
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

In an older code blob of mine I came across this oddity: for a, b, _ in zip(iter_a, iter_b, iter_c): ... which should be simplified to for a, b in zip(iter_a, iter_b): ... by removing iter_c entirely. Turns out I had this pattern in two other places as well 🤦🏻‍♂️ Would this not be a useful idiom to look for and warn about? (Assuming _ isn’t used in the body of the loop…)

📅 Opened Feb 25, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for PyCQA/flake8-bugbear

When evaluating whether to contribute to PyCQA/flake8-bugbear, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of PyCQA/flake8-bugbear acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 15 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 77.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to PyCQA/flake8-bugbear

01

Is PyCQA/flake8-bugbear welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

PyCQA/flake8-bugbear has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~15 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.4 places PyCQA/flake8-bugbear in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for PyCQA/flake8-bugbear?

The external pull request merge rate is 77.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in PyCQA/flake8-bugbear?

Yes, PyCQA/flake8-bugbear currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for PyCQA/flake8-bugbear are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.