PointCloudLibrary/pcl - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Point Cloud Library (PCL)

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 57/100

External PR Merge Rate: 60%

Response Time: 17h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PointCloudLibrary/pcl welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

PointCloudLibrary/pcl has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in PointCloudLibrary/pcl respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 17.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 57.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 57.4 places PointCloudLibrary/pcl in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for PointCloudLibrary/pcl?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for PointCloudLibrary/pcl is 60.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in PointCloudLibrary/pcl?

PointCloudLibrary/pcl does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

PointCloudLibrary
PointCloudLibrary/pclA•Welcoming11.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
PointCloudLibrary

PointCloudLibrary/pcl

11,141
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(57/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)C++

Point Cloud Library (PCL)

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.5/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in PointCloudLibrary/pcl. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in PointCloudLibrary/pcl focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Run the repository formatter and linter locally
  • •Keep PRs small and focused on one change

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not submit formatting-only noise with feature changes
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
17 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
60.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
12 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
60.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe71/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for PointCloudLibrary/pcl
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/PointCloudLibrary/pcl)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/PointCloudLibrary/pcl?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Summary Variant analysis of historical fixes in pcl identified 1 code site where an integer-overflow guard, bounds check, or safe-allocation wrapper exists at one location but is missing at a structurally identical sibling location (same file, same function, or same pattern family) elsewhere in the codebase. Each finding below is code-confirmed against the current HEAD (verified by cloning the repository fresh and checking the pattern is still present), with the exact file/line locations, the root cause, a description of the trigger path, and — where available — ASan/execution verification output or a proof-of-concept. Note on origin: these were surfaced by an automated variant-analysis pipeline that diffs historical fix commits against sibling code paths, then has each candidate manually reviewed. I'm posting them together per-project rather than as separate issues to respect maintainer time. Happy to split, close, or reprioritize any of these as you see fit. Finding 1: PCL — A

📅 Opened Sep 28, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Full list: cuda/filters/include/pcl/cuda/filters/voxel_grid.h:PCL_DEPRECATED_HEADER(1, 16, "The CUDA VoxelGrid filter does not work. Use the CPU VoxelGrid filter instead.") cuda/filters/include/pcl/cuda/filters/filter.h: PCL_DEPRECATED(1, 16, "use bool getFilterLimitsNegative() instead") filters/include/pcl/filters/voxel_grid.h: PCL_DEPRECATED(1, 16, "use bool getFilterLimitsNegative() instead") filters/include/pcl/filters/voxel_grid.h: PCL_DEPRECATED(1, 16, "use bool getFilterLimitsNegative() instead") geometry/include/pcl/geometry/boost.h:PCL_DEPRECATED_HEADER(1, 16, "Please include the needed boost headers directly.") gpu/containers/src/device_memory.cpp:PCL_DEPRECATED(1, 16, "Removed in favour of c++11 atomics") outofcore/include/pcl/outofcore/boost.h:PCL_DEPRECATED_HEADER(1, 16, "Please include the needed boost headers directly.") visualization/include/pcl/visualization/boost.h:PCL_DEPRECATED_HEADER(1, 16, "Please include the needed boost headers directly.") visuali

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for PointCloudLibrary/pcl

When evaluating whether to contribute to PointCloudLibrary/pcl, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of PointCloudLibrary/pcl acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 17 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 60.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to PointCloudLibrary/pcl

01

Is PointCloudLibrary/pcl welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

PointCloudLibrary/pcl has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~17 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 57.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 57.4 places PointCloudLibrary/pcl in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for PointCloudLibrary/pcl?

The external pull request merge rate is 60.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in PointCloudLibrary/pcl?

PointCloudLibrary/pcl does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for PointCloudLibrary/pcl are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.