PerryTS/perry - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A native TypeScript/JavaScript compiler written in Rust. Compiles TypeScript/JavaScript directly to executables using SWC and LLVM.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 68/100

External PR Merge Rate: 86%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PerryTS/perry welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

PerryTS/perry has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in PerryTS/perry respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 67.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 67.8 places PerryTS/perry in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for PerryTS/perry?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for PerryTS/perry is 86.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in PerryTS/perry?

PerryTS/perry currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

PerryTS
PerryTS/perryA•Welcoming5.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
PerryTS

PerryTS/perry

4,980
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(68/100)Rust

A native TypeScript/JavaScript compiler written in Rust. Compiles TypeScript/JavaScript directly to executables using SWC and LLVM.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.0/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
45%

Collaborative maintainer environment in PerryTS/perry. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
86.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
86.3%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe59/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for PerryTS/perry
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/PerryTS/perry)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/PerryTS/perry?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Problem crates/perry-codegen/src/codegen/string_pool.rs looks up method and property names with strings.iter().find(|e| e.value == …) in four places (~L1085, ~L1143, ~L1421, ~L1524), once per class method or property registration. That's O(pool size × members). On a large bundle (~190k pool entries, tens of thousands of members) it's a pure compile-time waste. Fix Use (or expose) the pool's existing intern index (a HashMap<String, idx> or similar that interning already maintains) for these lookups. The emitted IR must not change. Verify cargo test --release -p perry-codegen passes, and the emitted IR is byte-identical before and after on the gap corpus (e.g. --trace llvm diff on a sample of test-files). A compile-time probe: generate a program with ~500 classes × 50 methods, and time perry compile before and after (report). Rules for the PR (repo conventions) Code + tests + a changelog.d/<PR>-<slug>.md fragment. No version bump (don't touch [workspace.package].version, the CLAUD

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Problem parent_dense_store (crates/perry-runtime/src/object/class_image.rs ~L343–346) initialises the per-image dense parent table with (0..PARENT_DENSE_CAP).map(|_| AtomicU32::new(0)).collect(), i.e. 65,536 AtomicU32. That is 256 KiB written element-by-element (every page dirtied) the first time any class has a parent. The same pattern is used for the anon fast-slot table (~L369). Separately, parent_static.rs (~L25–45) publishes each in-window edge to the dense table and inserts it into the CLASS_REGISTRY hash map under a write lock, so every in-window edge is stored twice. Fix Allocate the table zeroed (Box::<[AtomicU32]>::new_zeroed_slice(N) + assume_init, or allocate [u32] zeroed and transmute; 0 already means "no parent"), so untouched pages stay clean. Consider sizing to the program's max class id if cheaply known. For class ids inside the dense window, skip the CLASS_REGISTRY insert, and make every reader consult the dense table first for in-window ids. Audit all CLASS_REGI

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Summary Add an opt-in WinUI 3 / Fluent rendering backend for Windows, selectable via --target windows-winui, alongside the existing Win32/GDI backend (crates/perry-ui-windows). Motivation from discussion #3486: the current Win32/GDI output looks dated (boxy, flat, no animation, Win7-era controls). WinUI 3 brings Fluent Design — rounded corners, Mica/Acrylic materials, smooth animations, modern typography, crisp auto-DPI — and is the closest Windows analog to our iOS/Android look-and-feel. Scope / decisions Opt-in, not the default. WinUI 3 requires the WinAppSDK runtime + an MSIX/bootstrapper packaging story, which conflicts with Perry's single-native-.exe model. Keep Win32 as the default target; expose WinUI via --target windows-winui. Mirrors how we ship multiple Apple targets. No new "UI framework" dependency confusion: microsoft/windows-rs (already a dep, windows = "0.58") is the WinRT projection crate, not a UI lib. WinUI from Rust = driving WinAppSDK + XAML through the WinRT

📅 Opened Jun 6, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

The problem Some developers prefer to use signals for UI updates rather than React with its heavy-handed virtual DOM / diff algorithm. SolidJS is the fastest renderer out there -- a nice fit with perry/ui on mobile devices where speed and small memory footprint are desired. Proposed solution The SolidJS package is not tied to a web DOM renderer and is used by other non-web frameworks to generate a native UI. To implement this, you can use SolidJS with a universal renderer and only have to implement the following: createElement(string) { return document.createElement(string); }, createTextNode(value) { return document.createTextNode(value); }, replaceText(textNode, value) { textNode.data = value; }, setProperty(node, name, value) { if (name === "style") Object.assign(node.style, value); else if (name.startsWith("on")) node[name.toLowerCase()] = value; else if (PROPERTIES.has(name)) node[name] = value; else node.setAttribute(name, value); }, insertNode(parent, node, anchor)

📅 Opened Jun 5, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for PerryTS/perry

When evaluating whether to contribute to PerryTS/perry, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of PerryTS/perry acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 86.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to PerryTS/perry

01

Is PerryTS/perry welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

PerryTS/perry has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 67.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 67.8 places PerryTS/perry in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for PerryTS/perry?

The external pull request merge rate is 86.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in PerryTS/perry?

Yes, PerryTS/perry currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for PerryTS/perry are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.