Perfect-Abstractions/Compose - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A smart contract library that emphasizes readability and onchain composability using EIP-2535 / EIP-8153 Diamonds.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 17/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Perfect-Abstractions/Compose welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Perfect-Abstractions/Compose has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Perfect-Abstractions/Compose respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 33.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 17.5 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 17.5 places Perfect-Abstractions/Compose in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Perfect-Abstractions/Compose?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Perfect-Abstractions/Compose is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Perfect-Abstractions/Compose?

Perfect-Abstractions/Compose currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Perfect-Abstractions
Perfect-Abstractions/ComposeD•Risky111
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Perfect-Abstractions

Perfect-Abstractions/Compose

111
InactiveD•Risky(17/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)SOSolidity

A smart contract library that emphasizes readability and onchain composability using EIP-2535 / EIP-8153 Diamonds.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in Perfect-Abstractions/Compose welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe5/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Perfect-Abstractions/Compose
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Perfect-Abstractions/Compose)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Perfect-Abstractions/Compose?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Question for research Should Compose Support an ERC-4626 Implementation? Before deciding whether to include an ERC-4626 implementation in Compose, we would like to conduct research on how ERC-4626 is actually used and extended in projects. Research Question How is ERC-4626 customized in the wild? Specifically: How do real-world projects extend ERC-4626 implementations? Do most vaults override core functions? Are teams typically inheriting from OpenZeppelin’s implementation or other contract lib? Is there meaningful value in providing a reusable facet version inside Compose? Context The development is currently blocked for ERC4626 (See related Issue & PR) The hesitation to include ERC-4626 in Compose is based on the following concerns: Many/most vaults will have custom versions of these standard functions, and so will not use provided version by Compose facets. This vault standard add some complexity with the muldiv function (that can be delayed if we don't include ERC-4626) This

📅 Opened Feb 26, 2026💬 9 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Solidity beginner tasks?Explore Solidity GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Perfect-Abstractions/Compose

When evaluating whether to contribute to Perfect-Abstractions/Compose, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Perfect-Abstractions/Compose acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Perfect-Abstractions/Compose

01

Is Perfect-Abstractions/Compose welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Perfect-Abstractions/Compose has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 17.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 17.5 places Perfect-Abstractions/Compose in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Perfect-Abstractions/Compose?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Perfect-Abstractions/Compose?

Yes, Perfect-Abstractions/Compose currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Perfect-Abstractions/Compose are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.