The Predictive Ecosystem Analyzer (PEcAn) is an integrated ecological bioinformatics toolbox.
C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 73/100
External PR Merge Rate: 100%
Response Time: <1h
First Timer Success: 100%
PecanProject/pecan has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
Maintainers in PecanProject/pecan respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.
The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 73.0 places PecanProject/pecan in the S tier.
The external contributor pull request merge rate for PecanProject/pecan is 100.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.
PecanProject/pecan currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".
Collaborative maintainer environment in PecanProject/pecan. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.
Discussions in PecanProject/pecan focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.
Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.
Average Response Latency
Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.
External Acceptance Rate
Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.
First PR Conversion
Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.
Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.
[](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/PecanProject/pecan?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)
External PR acceptance
First PR success rate
50% receive response in
90% receive response in
Maintainer review activity heatmap & prime window prediction
Calculating local time...
Calculating local time...
Detected: UTC
Maintainers are most responsive around 11:00 UTC (11:00 UTC in your timezone). Recommended submission window is Wednesday - Friday from 09:00 to 13:00 UTC (09:00 - 13:00 UTC local).
Limited recent maintainer review activity recorded for this repository. Prediction based on heuristic baseline.
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~4 hours (96% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~4 hours (45% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
Enter your branch size and test coverage below to forecast review turnaround and get 1-click git splitting commands.
Alternative open-source projects with active maintainers in R.
openxlsx2 - read, write and modify xlsx files
caret (Classification And Regression Training) R package that contains misc functions for training and plotting classification and regression models
rOpenSci Packages: Development, Maintenance, and Peer Review
Description Note to new contributors: Thank you for considering this task! This is larger than many “good first issues.” You are welcome to turn a subset of steps into a sub-task and take that on. And please reach out on Slack for guidance! The PEcAn model READMEs and documentation are minimal and mostly include generic template material. This issue focuses on the PEcAn.SIPNET model docs because: SIPNET is one of PEcAn’s exemplar model couplers, and The standalone SIPNET documentation is relatively up to date: https://pecanproject.github.io/sipnet Current limitations: The SIPNET docs in the PEcAn book (https://pecanproject.github.io/pecan-documentation/develop/models-sipnet.html) have missing fields (e.g. homepage, authors) and still contain generic template text. The PEcAn.SIPNET README is very sparse. Information is split between the README and the PEcAn book page, and it’s not clear how they relate. The goal of this issue is to: Improve the PEcAn.SIPNET README so it a
Description BADM_IC_process() in modules/data.land/R/IC_BADM_Utilities.R currently implements its own ad‑hoc logic to distinguish single‑site vs multi‑site runs by checking for a top‑level "run" element and then wrapping settings in list(settings) Proposed Refactor Use PEcAn.settings::papply() instead of manual normalization papply() internally handles is.Settings() / is.MultiSettings() type checking Update tests to ensure this consistent behavior across single-site and multi-site configurations.
Description The PEcAn repo has many GitHub labels (see the labels page), including duplicates, rarely used, and obsolete labels. We also have an automated PR labeler workflow in .github/labeler.yml. This issue aims to simplify and document the repository labels. Goals Reduce the labels to a smaller, clearer, documented set. Avoid duplicates / near-duplicates and obsolete labels. Keep labeler.yml in sync with the final label set. Tasks Inventory current labels Make a list of existing labels in a google doc or spreadsheet so the team can help with this. Provide a link to spreadsheet here: Identify: Duplicates and synonyms Obsolete labels - those with few or zero associated issues/PRs and / or otherwise not particularly helpful New Label Audit and Propose updates - request input from maintainers / community Do we want to standardize around category: label format? if so, categorize labels. Color scheme Labels to combine (identify replacement) Labels to remove Color scheme Sho
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
When evaluating whether to contribute to PecanProject/pecan, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of PecanProject/pecan acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 100.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
PecanProject/pecan has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 73.0 places PecanProject/pecan in the Elite tier.
The external pull request merge rate is 100.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
Yes, PecanProject/pecan currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.
All metrics displayed for PecanProject/pecan are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.