OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Avogadro libraries provide 3D rendering, visualization, analysis and data processing useful in computational chemistry, molecular modeling, bioinformatics, materials science, and related areas.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 58%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.0 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.0 places OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs is 58.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs?

OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

OpenChemistry
OpenChemistry/avogadrolibsA•Welcoming688
GitHub
Back to Explorer
OpenChemistry

OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs

688
InactiveA•Welcoming(63/100)C++

Avogadro libraries provide 3D rendering, visualization, analysis and data processing useful in computational chemistry, molecular modeling, bioinformatics, materials science, and related areas.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.0/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
58.1%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
83.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
13 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
58.1%
Merge Gauge
83.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe48/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

codespell finds common misspellings in code and comments. It's now part of avogadrolibs' pre-commit checks (#3102), but 31 typos from before it was added are still in the code. They're listed below. This issue fixes them, so that pre-commit run codespell --all-files passes. The configuration in .codespellrc matters. Out of the box, codespell reports about 2,600 "typos" in this repository, and almost all of them are correct: Chemistry and file formats: CONECT (a PDB record), Te and Nd (tellurium and neodymium), SER (serine), $CONTRL (a GAMESS input group), lj/cut/coul (a LAMMPS pair style), &OT (a CP2K section). "Correcting" these would break Avogadro's file readers and the input files it writes. Translations: about 2,500 hits are in i18n/*.po, which are Bosnian, Catalan and other languages, not English typos. Citations and test data: e.g. "An imbedded [sic] family…", "J. Numer. Anal.", "Formate anion". .codespellrc skips or ignores all of these, with a comment explaining each word.

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

clang-tidy is a C++ linter. avogadrolibs already has a .clang-tidy configuration, but nobody works through its warnings regularly, so a backlog has built up. This issue covers checks whose fixes are mechanical: clang-tidy applies them itself with --fix, and the result means exactly what the old code did. One PR per checkbox, please. Comment below with the box you're taking so two people don't pick the same one. Keep each PR to what clang-tidy produces. The diff should be clang-tidy's own fixes, formatted, and nothing else. A reviewer can then confirm it by re-running the same command. If you need to hand-edit something, say so in the PR and explain why. Please don't touch avogadro/qtplugins/qtaim/ (due for a larger rewrite) or avogadro/qtplugins/surfaces/surfaces.cpp (other changes in progress). Checks Counts are from a scan of the current code. readability-container-size-empty v.size() == 0 → v.empty(), s == "" → s.empty(), and so on. avogadro/core: 22 in 9 files avogadro/io: 2

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Clazy is a static analyzer for Qt code. It flags patterns that compile fine but are slow, fragile or quietly wrong. Running it on avogadrolibs turns up a set of small, mechanical fixes, listed below. The biggest group is old-style connections, which name signals and slots as strings: // Old: checked only at run time. A typo or a wrong argument list // prints a warning to the console and the connection never happens. connect(ui.showHydrogens, SIGNAL(toggled(bool)), this, SLOT(updatePreview())); // New: checked by the compiler. connect(ui.showHydrogens, &QCheckBox::toggled, this, &MyDialog::updatePreview); This isn't only cosmetic. Two string connections in avogadrolibs had been silently doing nothing, one of them since 2017. Converting the rest lets the compiler catch any others. One PR per checkbox, please. Comment below with the box you're taking so two people don't pick the same one. Please don't touch avogadro/qtplugins/qtaim/; it's due for a larger rewrite. Part 1: new-style signa

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Avogadro fuzzes its file readers nightly with libFuzzer under AddressSanitizer and UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: random variations of real files are fed to each parser to find crashes, hangs and memory errors. Several readers aren't fuzzed yet, even though sample files for them are already in avogadrodata. Adding a target needs no C++, only two CMake and workflow lists. One PR per format, please. Comment below with the format you're taking so two people don't pick the same one. Every format in a section needs the same edits. Formats avogadrolibs/tests/io gro (GROMACS): table entry gro, 15 seeds in data/gro/ mol (MDL Molfile): table entry mol=sdf. data/sdf/ holds the three .mol files. This shares a parser with the existing sdf target, so it mainly adds the single-molecule path. dcd (CHARMM/NAMD trajectory, binary): table entry dcd, 1 seed in data/dcd/. Talk to a maintainer first: the DCD header reader has known unaligned reads, so UBSan will likely fail this target straight away. It m

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Avogadro can be driven over JSON-RPC (see https://avogadro.cc/source/develop/rpc.md). Plugins opt in by registering command names and answering them in handleCommand(). Today only 8 of 79 plugins do: bonding, crystal, spacegroup, resetview, navigator, surfaces, vibrations (extensions) and aligntool (tool). This is a list of simple 'wiring' tasks to add commands to different C++ classes The recipe avogadro/qtplugins/bonding/bonding.cpp is the reference implementation. Read it first; every Tier 1 item below is the same three edits. 1. Header (myplugin.h) — add the two overrides: bool handleCommand(const QString& command, const QVariantMap& options) override; void registerCommands() override; 2. Register (myplugin.cpp) — one line per command, description translated: void MyPlugin::registerCommands() { emit registerCommand("addHydrogens", tr("Add hydrogens to the molecule.")); } 3. Dispatch — guard on the molecule, then call the existing slot: bool MyPlugi

📅 Opened Sep 8, 2026💬 19 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs

When evaluating whether to contribute to OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 58.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs

01

Is OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.0 places OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs?

The external pull request merge rate is 58.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs?

Yes, OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.