OWASP/OpenCRE - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 61%

Response Time: 21h

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is OWASP/OpenCRE welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

OWASP/OpenCRE has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in OWASP/OpenCRE respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 21.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 57.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 57.6 places OWASP/OpenCRE in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for OWASP/OpenCRE?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for OWASP/OpenCRE is 61.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in OWASP/OpenCRE?

OWASP/OpenCRE does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

OWASP
OWASP/OpenCREA•Welcoming187
GitHub
Back to Explorer
OWASP

OWASP/OpenCRE

187
InactiveA•Welcoming(58/100)Python

Open-source repository analyzed with precision C-Rank telemetry.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
8.2/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
22%

Balanced & professional review environment in OWASP/OpenCRE. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
21 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
61.1%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
29 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
61.1%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe53/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for OWASP/OpenCRE
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/OWASP/OpenCRE)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/OWASP/OpenCRE?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Issue What is the issue? Add an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for OpenCRE that exposes the same capabilities as the existing REST API (/rest/v1/..., documented in docs/api/openapi.yaml), with identical authentication and authorisation requirements. Agents and IDEs should be able to call OpenCRE through MCP the same way clients call REST today — including authenticated surfaces such as MyOpenCRE (GET/PUT /rest/v1/user/resources), chat completion (POST /rest/v1/completion), and any other @login_required / feature-flagged routes — without a weaker or parallel auth model. Expected Behaviour Capability parity MCP tools (and resources/prompts where appropriate) map 1:1 (or via a thin, documented mapping) to OpenAPI operations under /rest/v1. Public endpoints remain callable without login (same as REST). Protected endpoints require the same login / feature gates as REST, e.g.: MyOpenCRE: CRE_ENABLE_LOGIN + CRE_ENABLE_MYOPENCRE + authenticated session (login_required) for /rest/v

📅 Opened Aug 2, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Goal Consolidate frontend E2E from Jest/Puppeteer to Cypress; keep Python Playwright for backend/embeddings E2E (separate concern). Context Frontend browser E2E is effectively dead on main today: yarn test:e2e runs Jest (package.json), but application/frontend/src/test/basic-e2e.test.ts is fully commented out (legacy Puppeteer) .github/workflows/e2e.yml is entirely commented out — E2E does not run in CI jest-puppeteer / puppeteer remain in package.json as dead tooling Playwright in this repo is Python-only (application/prompt_client/ for embeddings/scraping). It is not the frontend E2E runner. make install-python must keep playwright install. Two open PRs overlap on Cypress migration (see Pending merges): #729 — restore Cypress under application/frontend/src/test/cypress/, re-enable e2e.yml #774 — fuller migration: root cypress.config.js, cypress/e2e/smoke.cy.js, stabilized make e2e, switches test:e2e to cypress run Related: #523 (fix e2e tests). Implementation instructions 0

📅 Opened Jul 8, 2026💬 11 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for OWASP/OpenCRE

When evaluating whether to contribute to OWASP/OpenCRE, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of OWASP/OpenCRE acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 21 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 61.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to OWASP/OpenCRE

01

Is OWASP/OpenCRE welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

OWASP/OpenCRE has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~21 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 57.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 57.6 places OWASP/OpenCRE in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for OWASP/OpenCRE?

The external pull request merge rate is 61.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in OWASP/OpenCRE?

OWASP/OpenCRE does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for OWASP/OpenCRE are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.