OWASP/Nest - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Your gateway to OWASP. Discover, engage, and help shape the future!

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 70%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is OWASP/Nest welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

OWASP/Nest has a recorded first-timer success rate of 42.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in OWASP/Nest respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.1 places OWASP/Nest in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for OWASP/Nest?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for OWASP/Nest is 69.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in OWASP/Nest?

OWASP/Nest currently has 11 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

OWASP
OWASP/NestA•Welcoming458
GitHub
Back to Explorer
OWASP

OWASP/Nest

458
InactiveA•Welcoming(66/100)Python

Your gateway to OWASP. Discover, engage, and help shape the future!

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
6.9/10
Patience Score
7.4/10
Nitpick Rate
39%

Balanced & professional review environment in OWASP/Nest. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
69.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
42.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
41 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
69.6%
Merge Gauge
42.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe41/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for OWASP/Nest
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/OWASP/Nest)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/OWASP/Nest?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Describe the bug StaticSitemap.lastmod (backend/src/apps/sitemap/views/static.py) maps each static route to a model so it can compute lastmod from that model's most recent updated_at. The /repositories route is listed in BaseSitemap.STATIC_ROUTES but is missing from the path_to_model mapping, so it falls through to the datetime.now(UTC) fallback that is meant for unknown paths. As a result, the /repositories entry in the static sitemap reports the current time as its lastmod on every regeneration, instead of the latest repository update like the other seven routes. To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Generate the static sitemap. Compare the <lastmod> value for /repositories against /chapters, /projects, etc. /repositories shows the regeneration timestamp, while the other routes show their model's latest updated_at. Expected behavior /repositories should derive its lastmod from the most recently updated Repository (Repository.objects.aggregate(Max("updated_at"))), consistent

📅 Opened Jul 20, 2026💬 12 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Community & Support: LinkedIn Group · Slack #project-nest Active project leaders: Arkadii Yakovets -- GitHub · LinkedIn · Slack; Kate Golovanova -- GitHub · LinkedIn · Slack Contributing · Code of Conduct · GSoC Mentors Describe the bug The navbar does not scale properly causing layout inconsistencies on devices such as iPad Mini and iPad Pro. It should scale responsively so that all elements fit correctly across different screen sizes without breaking the layout. To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Visit https://nest.owasp.org/. Open Chrome DevTools. Enable Device Toolbar. Select iPad Mini or iPad Pro. Observe the navbar layout. Expected behavior The navbar should scale and adapt properly on all screen, ensuring all elements fit within the available width without breaking the layout. Are you going to work on fixing this? Yes No Screenshots

📅 Opened Jul 11, 2026💬 8 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Community & Support: LinkedIn Group · Slack #project-nest Active project leaders: Arkadii Yakovets -- GitHub · LinkedIn · Slack; Kate Golovanova -- GitHub · LinkedIn · Slack Contributing · Code of Conduct · GSoC Mentors Describe the bug The spacing below the Search component is inconsistent across different Nest pages in mobile viewport. Some pages include adequate vertical spacing between the search bar and the content below it, while others have little to no spacing, resulting in an inconsistent visual layout. To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Resize to mobile viewport Navigate to the Projects/Members page, and observe that there is no vertical spacing below the Search bar Now nevigate to the Chapters/Committees page and ovserve the presence of vertical spacing Expected behavior The Search component should have consistent bottom spacing across all pages where it is used, ensuring a uniform layout and visual hierarchy. Are you going to work on fixing this? Yes

📅 Opened Jul 7, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Problem Repository cards currently show stars, forks, contributors, and issues, but they do not show when the repository was last updated. Without activity information, users cannot quickly determine whether a repository is actively maintained. Proposed Solution Display the repository's last updated date on repository cards using the existing updatedAt field. Benefits Improves repository discovery. Provides activity visibility. Helps contributors identify actively maintained repositories.

📅 Opened Jun 12, 2026💬 13 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. The breadcrumb trail at the top of every page is wrapped in a <div> element. Screen reader users cannot identify it as a navigation landmark using their landmark navigation shortcuts (e.g., VoiceOver rotor, NVDA elements list). This makes it harder for assistive technology users to quickly orient themselves on the page. Describe the solution you'd like Wrap the breadcrumb component in a <nav> element with aria-label="Breadcrumb" so screen readers can identify it as a navigation region and users can jump to it directly. The change is in frontend/src/components/BreadCrumbs.tsx: Line 13: <div> → <nav aria-label="Breadcrumb"> Line 56: </div> → </nav> Describe alternatives you've considered Using role="navigation" on the existing <div> — less semantic than <nav> Keeping the current <div> — works for sighted users but misses an opportunity for better screen reader support Are you going to work on implementing this?

📅 Opened Jun 11, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for OWASP/Nest

When evaluating whether to contribute to OWASP/Nest, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of OWASP/Nest acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 69.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to OWASP/Nest

01

Is OWASP/Nest welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

OWASP/Nest has a recorded first-timer success rate of 42.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.1 places OWASP/Nest in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for OWASP/Nest?

The external pull request merge rate is 69.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in OWASP/Nest?

Yes, OWASP/Nest currently has 11 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for OWASP/Nest are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.