MetaMask/metamask-extension - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

:globe_with_meridians: :electric_plug: The MetaMask browser extension enables browsing Ethereum blockchain enabled websites

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 66%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is MetaMask/metamask-extension welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

MetaMask/metamask-extension has a recorded first-timer success rate of 57.5%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in MetaMask/metamask-extension respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 24.4 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 67.0 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 67.0 places MetaMask/metamask-extension in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for MetaMask/metamask-extension?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for MetaMask/metamask-extension is 65.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in MetaMask/metamask-extension?

MetaMask/metamask-extension currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

MetaMask
MetaMask/metamask-extensionA•Welcoming13.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
MetaMask

MetaMask/metamask-extension

13,228
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(67/100)TypeScript

:globe_with_meridians: :electric_plug: The MetaMask browser extension enables browsing Ethereum blockchain enabled websites

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.0/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in MetaMask/metamask-extension. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
65.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
57.5%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
114 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
65.6%
Merge Gauge
57.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe55/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for MetaMask/metamask-extension
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/MetaMask/metamask-extension)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/MetaMask/metamask-extension?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Goal Migrate deprecated extension UI component usages to MMDS components from @metamask/design-system-react, in small easy-to-review PRs. This is an evergreen tracker. Do not try to complete every deprecated usage in one PR. Visual Evidence Is Required Before/after visual assets are the key output of this automation. Every PR must include visual evidence for the changed UI so reviewers can confirm there was no regression without manually rebuilding the branch. Required: A before screenshot from current main. An after screenshot from the PR branch. A short note identifying the route, Storybook story, state setup, or mm flow used to capture the screenshots. Screenshots must show the migrated component in context, not only a cropped DOM fragment or isolated code diff. Preferred: Use the MetaMask visual-testing skill or mm flow. Repo guidance lives in test/e2e/playwright/llm-workflow/. Use the same viewport, state, account, network, and route for before and after screenshots. Include an

📅 Opened Jun 8, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for MetaMask/metamask-extension

When evaluating whether to contribute to MetaMask/metamask-extension, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of MetaMask/metamask-extension acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 65.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to MetaMask/metamask-extension

01

Is MetaMask/metamask-extension welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

MetaMask/metamask-extension has a recorded first-timer success rate of 57.5%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 67.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 67.0 places MetaMask/metamask-extension in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for MetaMask/metamask-extension?

The external pull request merge rate is 65.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in MetaMask/metamask-extension?

Yes, MetaMask/metamask-extension currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for MetaMask/metamask-extension are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.