Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

AutoRAG: Now your agent can find anything in your computer. It gets smarter if you are using it frequently.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 83%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG has a recorded first-timer success rate of 75.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 69.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 69.3 places Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG is 82.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG?

Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Marker-Inc-Korea
Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAGA•Welcoming5.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Marker-Inc-Korea

Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG

5,122
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(69/100)TypeScript

AutoRAG: Now your agent can find anything in your computer. It gets smarter if you are using it frequently.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active TypeScript repository in Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG with ongoing community development and issue triage.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with TypeScript style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
82.9%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
75.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
4 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
82.9%
Merge Gauge
75.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe56/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

docs: add GitHub Gists to the public datasource list Summary GitHub Gists shipped as a datasource (github-gist, #1588 / #1591). The UI catalog and the live QA harness describe it. The pages a newcomer actually reads do not. What is already true src/ui/catalog.ts has type github-gist: own-account gists, public and secret, incremental index, lexical and local semantic search. Token env falls back to the gh CLI login. The token is not stored. docs/manual-qa-datasources.md lists scripts/manual-qa/run-qa-github-gist-live.ts. README.md Supported Datasources has a GitHub row for Issues and Pull Requests only. No Gist row. docs/datasource-skills.md has no Gist section. Task Add a Gist row to the README table (alias, backend, what is stored, search modes). Keep it distinct from the Issues/PRs row. Add a short section to docs/datasource-skills.md next to the other connector skills: type, tags, token env, and the fact that semantic search stays on the local gateway. Do not copy the manual-QA s

📅 Opened Sep 23, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Summary Remove the legacy StoreManifest metadata loader, manifestDir option, and the unused ## Indexed Stores system prompt section. Background src/manifest/ (StoreManifest, loadManifests) was introduced during the initial AutoRAG 2.0 monorepo migration (#1290) as a conceptual stub for describing external index stores. However, it has no actual retrieval execution logic: no retriever or search tool queries these manifests, and no CLI command exposes --manifest-dir. In current AutoRAG 2.0 architecture, external vector DBs and custom indexes belong in the standard Datasource Skill framework (DatasourceSkill, search_datasource_documents), making StoreManifest completely redundant dead code. In production/local environments, manifestDir is always unset and config.manifests is empty. Scope of Removal src/manifest/: Remove entire directory (loader.ts, types.ts, index.ts). src/agent/agent.ts: Remove manifestDir constructor option and loadManifests integration. src/agent/system-prompt.ts: R

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG

When evaluating whether to contribute to Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 82.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG

01

Is Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG has a recorded first-timer success rate of 75.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 69.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 69.3 places Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG?

The external pull request merge rate is 82.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG?

Yes, Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Marker-Inc-Korea/AutoRAG are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.