Maneek21/Deft - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Self-hostable AGPL workspace where humans and AI agents share chat, tasks, knowledge, approvals, and MCP context.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 58%

Response Time: 6d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Maneek21/Deft welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Maneek21/Deft has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Maneek21/Deft respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 135.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 59.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 59.6 places Maneek21/Deft in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Maneek21/Deft?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Maneek21/Deft is 57.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Maneek21/Deft?

Maneek21/Deft currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Maneek21
Maneek21/DeftA•Welcoming234
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Maneek21

Maneek21/Deft

234
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(60/100)TypeScript

Self-hostable AGPL workspace where humans and AI agents share chat, tasks, knowledge, approvals, and MCP context.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in Maneek21/Deft. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in Maneek21/Deft focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
5 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
57.5%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
57.5%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe53/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Maneek21/Deft
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Maneek21/Deft)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Maneek21/Deft?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Current state Refreshed September 24, 2026 against master at 1427f66. The production browser smoke and individual keyboard improvements do not establish end-to-end keyboard or screen-reader coverage. No core-path screen-reader certification was found in this review. Evidence: browser smoke, roadmap. Remaining work Certify login, primary navigation, task creation, a governed agent approval, and personal MCP connection setup/revocation. Use the navigation and identity model of the tested revision. Acceptance evidence Complete each flow using only the keyboard; record revision, browser, and viewport. Verify visible focus, logical tab order, semantic names/labels, and useful validation feedback. Verify focus enters dialogs appropriately, remains contained where required, and returns sensibly on close. Record a manual screen-reader pass with a named reader/browser pair, covering controls, errors, and completion feedback. Add stable automated regression checks for discovered failures;

📅 Opened Jul 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Current state Refreshed September 24, 2026 against master at 1427f66. The public-docs checker already includes README.md, validates local Markdown links (including current image syntax), and reports missing targets. CI runs it through pnpm docs:check. The remaining gap is a regression fixture, not a new checker. Evidence: checker, CI; delivered through #330. Remaining work and acceptance evidence Validate current local README image paths and clearly report a missing target. Run the checker in documentation CI. A disposable fixture with an existing local image passes. A missing or renamed local image fails with a nonzero exit and identifies the README and missing path. The regression coverage runs in the documentation CI path. Record the focused test command and result in the fixing PR. Scope File existence only. Detecting whether screenshots match the current UI is separate work. Do not overwrite or remove repository screenshots to construct a failing fixture. Ownership and pri

📅 Opened Jul 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Current state Refreshed September 24, 2026 against master at 1427f66. The 60-person harness already emits JSON/HTML reports and enforces configured write/read latency, queue-drain, recovery, and attention-projection budgets. It is exposed as pnpm certify:60-person. No recurring workflow invoking that harness was found. Remaining work and acceptance evidence Wire the existing harness into weekly and manually dispatched CI, reusing its budgets and verdict. Run weekly on the default branch and support manual dispatch. Use disposable test data and infrastructure; preserve cleanup on failure. Record the exact commit, workload, configured budgets, result, and execution environment. Upload machine-readable results and a compact job summary, including failure diagnostics when available. Set explicit artifact retention and workflow timeout/concurrency limits. A failed verdict fails the job; missing results cannot appear as a pass. Demonstrate one successful workflow run and verify the f

📅 Opened Jul 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Current state Refreshed September 24, 2026 against master at 1427f66. Official release builds and release manifests still target linux/amd64. ARM64 is new supported-platform work, not a completed feature or a regression. Evidence: release workflow, manifest generator, limitations. Remaining work and acceptance evidence When ARM64 demand and an implementation owner are established, publish and certify an ARM64 release path. Publish a multi-architecture image or a documented separate linux/arm64 image. Run installation, doctor, and browser smoke on ARM64 hardware or clearly identified emulation. Record tested platform/environment and exact image identity. Keep signatures, provenance, manifests, and operator instructions accurate for every supported image. Verify the existing amd64 path remains functional. Ownership and priority Unassigned; Later. Excluded from Next preview hardening. Revisit when a concrete ARM64 installation need and a maintainer are identified; no delivery date

📅 Opened Jul 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Maneek21/Deft

When evaluating whether to contribute to Maneek21/Deft, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Maneek21/Deft acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 57.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Maneek21/Deft

01

Is Maneek21/Deft welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Maneek21/Deft has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 59.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 59.6 places Maneek21/Deft in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Maneek21/Deft?

The external pull request merge rate is 57.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Maneek21/Deft?

Yes, Maneek21/Deft currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Maneek21/Deft are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.