Manavarya09/design-extract - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Extract any website's complete design system with one command. DTCG tokens, semantic+primitive+composite, MCP server for Claude Code/Cursor/Windsurf, multi-platform emitters (iOS SwiftUI, Android Compose, Flutter, WordPress), Tailwind v4, Figma variables, shadcn/ui, CSS health audit, WCAG remediation, Chrome extension. MIT, Playwright, Node 20+.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 83%

Response Time: 11h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Manavarya09/design-extract welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Manavarya09/design-extract has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Manavarya09/design-extract respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 11.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.5 places Manavarya09/design-extract in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Manavarya09/design-extract?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Manavarya09/design-extract is 82.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Manavarya09/design-extract?

Manavarya09/design-extract currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Manavarya09
Manavarya09/design-extractA•Welcoming4.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Manavarya09

Manavarya09/design-extract

4,199
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(59/100)HTML

Extract any website's complete design system with one command. DTCG tokens, semantic+primitive+composite, MCP server for Claude Code/Cursor/Windsurf, multi-platform emitters (iOS SwiftUI, Android Compose, Flutter, WordPress), Tailwind v4, Figma variables, shadcn/ui, CSS health audit, WCAG remediation, Chrome extension. MIT, Playwright, Node 20+.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in Manavarya09/design-extract. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in Manavarya09/design-extract focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
11 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
82.9%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
82.9%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe85/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Manavarya09/design-extract
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Manavarya09/design-extract)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Manavarya09/design-extract?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

An extraction currently writes 17+ files. Some users only want one (e.g. just tailwind.config.js for a CI artifact). Add two filter flags so the file write loop only writes what's asked for. What Two new options on the main extract command: --only <list> only write the named emitters (comma-separated) --skip <list> skip the named emitters (comma-separated) Where <list> is comma-separated emitter ids like tailwind,figma,dtcg,shadcn,react,ios,android,flutter,wordpress,pdf,brand-book. Where bin/design-extract.js. The extract action handler has a sequence of writeFileSync(...) calls each tied to one emitter. Wrap that sequence in a small helper: function shouldEmit(id, opts) { if (opts.only) return opts.only.split(',').map(s => s.trim()).includes(id); if (opts.skip) return !opts.skip.split(',').map(s => s.trim()).includes(id); return true; } Then gate each write behind if (shouldEmit('tailwind', opts)) { ... }. Acceptance npx designlang stripe.com --only tailwind writes only th

📅 Opened May 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

designlang already emits SwiftUI extensions (ios/DesignTokens.swift). Add a parallel UIKit emitter so iOS teams on UIKit don't have to manually translate. Why A non-trivial share of iOS apps are still UIKit-only. The emitted file should give them UIColor and UIFont extensions with the same token names as the SwiftUI version, so the two compile side-by-side in a mixed codebase. What to build src/formatters/ios-uikit.js exporting formatIosUIKit(dtcg). Output shape: import UIKit extension UIColor { static let dlPrimary = UIColor(red: 0.32, green: 0.23, blue: 0.99, alpha: 1.0) static let dlBackground = UIColor(red: 1.0, green: 1.0, blue: 1.0, alpha: 1.0) // ... } extension UIFont { static func dlSans(size: CGFloat, weight: UIFont.Weight = .regular) -> UIFont { return UIFont(name: "sohne-var", size: size) ?? .systemFont(ofSize: size, weight: weight) } } enum DLSpacing { static let xs: CGFloat = 4 static let sm: CGFloat = 8 // ... } Wire it up Add formatIosUIKit to th

📅 Opened May 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Add a top-level --quiet / -q flag to the extract command so CI pipelines can run designlang without flooding their build logs. What When --quiet is passed: The progress spinner (ora) is suppressed. All informational console.log lines are skipped. Only the final summary block (or errors written to stderr) prints. The exit code is unchanged (0 on success, 1 on error). Where bin/design-extract.js. Add the option to the main extract command (and ideally to the other subcommands too: brand, pair, brands). A clean way: thread an opts.quiet boolean through the action handler and gate spinner.start() plus the console.log calls behind it. spinner = ora({ ... isSilent: opts.quiet }) is the cleanest path. Acceptance npx designlang stripe.com --quiet prints nothing on success. npx designlang stripe.com -q does the same. Errors still go to stderr and the exit code still reflects success/failure. An invalid URL still prints the error in quiet mode (via console.error). Scope ~20 lines across the

📅 Opened May 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Add a new emitter that writes Open Props (https://open-props.style) CSS custom properties from the extracted DTCG tokens. Mirrors the existing emitters in src/formatters/. Why Open Props is a popular zero-runtime CSS variables library and a natural fit for designlang's output. Adding it means users can plug an extraction straight into an Open Props project without a manual translation step. What to build src/formatters/open-props.js exporting formatOpenProps(design) that returns a string of @layer blocks following the Open Props conventions: @layer base { :root { --brand-1: <primary>; --brand-2: <secondary>; --size-1: <spacing[0]>; --size-2: <spacing[1]>; --font-sans: <typography.families[0]>; --radius-1: <radii[0]>; /* ...etc */ } } Wire it up Add formatOpenProps to the extract command's emit loop in bin/design-extract.js (search for where formatTailwind is written). Add a corresponding entry to website/lib/build-files.js so the web extractor includes

📅 Opened May 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more HTML beginner tasks?Explore HTML GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Manavarya09/design-extract

When evaluating whether to contribute to Manavarya09/design-extract, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Manavarya09/design-extract acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 11 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 82.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Manavarya09/design-extract

01

Is Manavarya09/design-extract welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Manavarya09/design-extract has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~11 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.5 places Manavarya09/design-extract in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Manavarya09/design-extract?

The external pull request merge rate is 82.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Manavarya09/design-extract?

Yes, Manavarya09/design-extract currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Manavarya09/design-extract are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.