LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A free and open-source java bytecode obfuscator with advanced features

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 43/100

External PR Merge Rate: 67%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 58.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 43.0 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 43.0 places LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator is 66.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator?

LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

LvStrnggg
LvStrnggg/aidsfuscatorB•Solid102
GitHub
Back to Explorer
LvStrnggg

LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator

102
InactiveB•Solid(43/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Java

A free and open-source java bytecode obfuscator with advanced features

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Verify all existing package test suites run cleanly
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
66.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
66.7%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe47/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

There is a bug currently with the method (and potentially even field) renamer which, at a bit more complex (not really) hierarchies breaks VIA name collision (more prominent with aggressive overloading set to true). This was tested on a ~3mb snake game jar (attached below alongside all of the libraries). The collisions happen in 2 or 3 classes. One of them is org.apache.logging.log4j.util.SortedArrayStringMap, which has name collisions with methods isEmpty()Z and isFrozen()Z. I have tried multiple solutions to try and tackle this issue, but to no avail. I even wrote code which detected name collisions before renaming, yet it still decided to collide names. isEmpty and isFrozen both get remapped to a. Combine that with matching descriptors and you get a ClassFormatError thrown. I personally think the issue lies in the hierarchy/how methods get mapped/win names from methods who already have these methods mapped. In the latest commit, I have added a DuplicateMethodCheckTransformer in the

📅 Opened Jul 2, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator

When evaluating whether to contribute to LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 66.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator

01

Is LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 43.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 43.0 places LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator?

The external pull request merge rate is 66.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator?

Yes, LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for LvStrnggg/aidsfuscator are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.