Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A toolset for generating inputs for controlling a Switch to draw whatever in Tomodachi Life, with support for outputting to an RP2040 or RP2350.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 70%

Response Time: 22h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 22.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.5 places Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer is 69.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer?

Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Lucas7yoshi
Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawerAWelcoming372
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Lucas7yoshi

Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer

372
AWelcoming(59/100)C#

A toolset for generating inputs for controlling a Switch to draw whatever in Tomodachi Life, with support for outputting to an RP2040 or RP2350.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.1/10
Nitpick Rate
28%

Balanced & professional review environment in Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
22 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
69.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
13 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
69.6%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe71/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Hello! This issue is for tracking features classified as "experimental". Reasons for features being experimental include, at this moment: Prone to desyncs May cause it to draw slower in some cases. This issue is intended for feedback reports on reliability. If you choose to use experimental features, I would love to hear how reliable (or not) they are, what goes wrong, what goes right, etc, so that experimental features may be promoted to stable features. Currently experimental functionality: Dynamic bucket fills on Switch 2. (The drawer draws arbitrary outlines for large areas, then uses one bucket click to fill. Reason for experimental classification: Not stable. It appears even the switch 2 can lag at times while using the bucket when doing large moves. See: https://sx.l7y.media/26/05/15/bucketdesync_switch2.mp4 Potential remedy: Switch to brush to do move, then back to bucket. This could avoid the lag that occurs when moving with the bucket (on switch 1 or 2) but greatly increa

📅 Opened May 15, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

I'm on release 0.3.1 and I am still getting desync on Switch 1. I've tried having it docked, I've tried undocked and plugging the board straight into the console. I've tried using different boards as well. I don't have a spare cable around so I haven't been able to test if that is the culprit in my situation. As far as I can tell I have the setup all correct, but it works fine for about 45 minutes and then the desync starts. I haven't been able to nail down exactly when it starts or why.

📅 Opened May 5, 2026💬 74 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more C# beginner tasks?Explore C# GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer

When evaluating whether to contribute to Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 22 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 69.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer

01

Is Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~22 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.5 places Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer?

The external pull request merge rate is 69.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer?

Yes, Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Lucas7yoshi/TomodachiDrawer are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.