LittleBigRefresh/Refresh - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A second-generation custom server for LittleBigPlanet that focuses on quality of life features and improving user experience.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 22/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: 8d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LittleBigRefresh/Refresh welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

LittleBigRefresh/Refresh has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in LittleBigRefresh/Refresh respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 180.9 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 21.9 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 21.9 places LittleBigRefresh/Refresh in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for LittleBigRefresh/Refresh?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for LittleBigRefresh/Refresh is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in LittleBigRefresh/Refresh?

LittleBigRefresh/Refresh currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

LittleBigRefresh
LittleBigRefresh/RefreshD•Risky121
GitHub
Back to Explorer
LittleBigRefresh

LittleBigRefresh/Refresh

121
InactiveD•Risky(22/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)C#

A second-generation custom server for LittleBigPlanet that focuses on quality of life features and improving user experience.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in LittleBigRefresh/Refresh welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
7 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for LittleBigRefresh/Refresh
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/LittleBigRefresh/Refresh)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/LittleBigRefresh/Refresh?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

This endpoint is intended to reset the user's progress on all pins. Unfortunately, unlike /reset_pin_progress, this endpoint is only called by debug builds when using a specific debug option to nuke all pin progress. The endpoint route doesn't even exist on retail builds. However, we should implement this endpoint anyway, especially since we already want to implement progress nuking itself (see #1109).

📅 Opened Aug 13, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Currently finding cheated scores is almost a matter of getting lucky and finding an outlier by stumbling on a cheated level. Would be cool to have: -A display of all of a users uploaded scores in the moderation page (which might not always mean much unless obvious (IE 4,000,000 in every level), but could at least be used to track the levels a person has submitted scores in and then examine placement level by level) (might also be useful for comments tbh) --'Purge from x day to y day' feature (some instances of users going wild on score cheating early on after connecting then calming down, could also see potential for the case of someone playing with another person who was score cheating) -Ability to disable scoring for a user entirely. I know restricted mode is a thing but sometimes the issue isn't comments/levels of a user but the trust being broken that a person will play fair. If we could disable scores for a user that would prevent the need for monitoring past offenders while also

📅 Opened Aug 8, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Occasionally, users (especially newer users) tend to forget their role or game preferences (whether their grief reports redirect, modded/reuploaded level filtering etc), and they also tend to not think of looking them up on the website. This has already left them confused a lot of times (like wondering why they can no longer see reuploads, or trying to actually grief report something and having their report be uploaded to public photos instead). One way to avoid this could be to show the user's account state (role, permissions, game preferences) on the announcements screen every time they log into the game. Additionally, we could also use LBP1's news feature (#851), or LBP2/3's recent activity news post feature (#1101). Besides reminding users, this would also be a quality-of-life feature where you wouldn't have to run chat commands to be extra sure of your preferences, and you wouldn't have to spend extra time looking your state up on the website. We could also make this be an opt-out

📅 Opened Jul 11, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

It'd be practical to, alongside keeping read-only as a master-switch to block any UGC, to also have several toggles to block uploads/edits of individual UGC types like levels, scores, comments etc. for certain role groups.

📅 Opened Jul 8, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 25/100Contribute
Looking for more C# beginner tasks?Explore C# GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for LittleBigRefresh/Refresh

When evaluating whether to contribute to LittleBigRefresh/Refresh, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of LittleBigRefresh/Refresh acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 7 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to LittleBigRefresh/Refresh

01

Is LittleBigRefresh/Refresh welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

LittleBigRefresh/Refresh has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~7 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 21.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 21.9 places LittleBigRefresh/Refresh in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for LittleBigRefresh/Refresh?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in LittleBigRefresh/Refresh?

Yes, LittleBigRefresh/Refresh currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for LittleBigRefresh/Refresh are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.