LinwoodDev/Butterfly - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

🎨 Powerful, minimalistic, cross-platform, opensource note-taking app

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 88%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LinwoodDev/Butterfly welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

LinwoodDev/Butterfly has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in LinwoodDev/Butterfly respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 63.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 67.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 67.1 places LinwoodDev/Butterfly in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for LinwoodDev/Butterfly?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for LinwoodDev/Butterfly is 88.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in LinwoodDev/Butterfly?

LinwoodDev/Butterfly currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

LinwoodDev
LinwoodDev/ButterflyAWelcoming2.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
LinwoodDev

LinwoodDev/Butterfly

1,987
AWelcoming(67/100)Dart

🎨 Powerful, minimalistic, cross-platform, opensource note-taking app

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
9.0/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Highly welcoming maintainers in LinwoodDev/Butterfly. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
88.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
9 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
88.5%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe65/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for LinwoodDev/Butterfly
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/LinwoodDev/Butterfly)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/LinwoodDev/Butterfly?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

What happened? When using the pen tool, lines appear when drawing, but disappear after about 2 seconds. line only renders after closing and reopening the app. Lines are still selectable with lasso tool while invisible, and persist in the file. Device: boox go 10.3 Reproduction steps: Draw a line with the stylus Lift the pen Observe line vanishes ~2 seconds later Close and reopen app Line reappears Version 2.5.3 and 2.5.2 Platform Android Relevant log output [info] | 15:18:26 679ms | App started [route] | 15:18:26 852ms | Open route named home Arguments: {} [route] | 15:18:28 394ms | Open route named new Arguments: {path: , remote: } [verbose] | 15:18:28 413ms | Changing tool to index: 0 [verbose] | 15:18:28 441ms | Baking viewport (reset: true, viewChanged: true, rendererStatesChanged: false) [verbose] | 15:18:29 970ms | Changing tool to index: 1 [verbose] | 15:18:29 970ms | Refreshing CurrentIndexCubit [bloc-event] | 15:18:31 174ms | DocumentBloc receive event: ToolsChanged [bloc-t

📅 Opened Jun 8, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe No response Describe your feature request! Currently, prerelease versions (beta, rc, etc.) don't include the prerelease identifier in the app's Info.plist file, which causes version comparison issues for third-party update checkers. Current behavior: GitHub Release tag: 2.5.0-beta.0 CFBundleShortVersionString in Info.plist: 2.5.0.0 ❌ CFBundleVersion in Info.plist: 164 Expected behavior: GitHub Release tag: 2.5.0-beta.0 CFBundleShortVersionString in Info.plist: 2.5.0-beta.0 ✅ CFBundleVersion in Info.plist: 164 Why this matters: When comparing versions programmatically: 2.5.0.0 (from Info.plist) > 2.5.0-beta.0 (from GitHub) ❌ Incorrect Update checkers think the local version is newer than the latest release This breaks automatic update detection Suggested fix: Include the prerelease identifier in CFBundleShortVersionString to match the semantic versioning standard: <key>CFBundleShortVersionString</key> <string>2.5.

📅 Opened Jan 19, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Dart beginner tasks?Explore Dart GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for LinwoodDev/Butterfly

When evaluating whether to contribute to LinwoodDev/Butterfly, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of LinwoodDev/Butterfly acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 88.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to LinwoodDev/Butterfly

01

Is LinwoodDev/Butterfly welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

LinwoodDev/Butterfly has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 67.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 67.1 places LinwoodDev/Butterfly in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for LinwoodDev/Butterfly?

The external pull request merge rate is 88.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in LinwoodDev/Butterfly?

Yes, LinwoodDev/Butterfly currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for LinwoodDev/Butterfly are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.