LadybugDB/ladybug - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

LadybugDB a graph database

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 71/100

External PR Merge Rate: 81%

Response Time: 13h

First Timer Success: 77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LadybugDB/ladybug welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

LadybugDB/ladybug has a recorded first-timer success rate of 76.9%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in LadybugDB/ladybug respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 13.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.0 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.0 places LadybugDB/ladybug in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for LadybugDB/ladybug?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for LadybugDB/ladybug is 81.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in LadybugDB/ladybug?

LadybugDB/ladybug currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

LadybugDB
LadybugDB/ladybugS•Elite1.8k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
LadybugDB

LadybugDB/ladybug

1,831
Active (30d)S•Elite(71/100)C++

LadybugDB a graph database

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.9/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in LadybugDB/ladybug. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
13 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
81.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
76.9%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
24 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
81.2%
Merge Gauge
76.9%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe76/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for LadybugDB/ladybug
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/LadybugDB/ladybug)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/LadybugDB/ladybug?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Motivation LogicalOperatorUtils::logicalOperatorTypeToString() threw Unknown logical operator type. at runtime on LSQB q9: the recent COUNT_ANTI_EDGE_CHAIN operator was added to the enum but a case was never added to the type-to-string switch. -Wall -Wextra (which includes -Wswitch) would have caught this at compile time — but the switch ended in default: throw RuntimeException(...), and any default: label silences -Wswitch. The failure mode was converted from a build error into a runtime crash. The same bug class exists in the sibling enum→string switches listed below. This was fixed for logicalOperatorTypeToString (see commit adding COUNT_ANTI_EDGE_CHAIN); this issue tracks applying the pattern to the rest. The pattern For switches that are exhaustive in intent (every enumerator returns / is handled): // Before: -Wswitch silently disabled switch (type) { case Foo::A: return "A"; default: throw RuntimeException("Unknown type."); } // After: -Wswitch enforces coverage; missing enu

📅 Opened Sep 7, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

We have nightly sanitizer runs now. These are beginner friendly tasks to fix https://github.com/LadybugDB/ladybug/actions/runs/33396106462/job/99500889127

📅 Opened Aug 31, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 35/100Contribute

API C++ Description Similar in concept: https://github.com/duckdb/extension-template Instead of stuffing everything into https://github.com/LadybugDB/extensions, this allows people to maintain their own unofficial extensions.

📅 Opened Aug 19, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 35/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for LadybugDB/ladybug

When evaluating whether to contribute to LadybugDB/ladybug, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of LadybugDB/ladybug acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 13 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 81.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to LadybugDB/ladybug

01

Is LadybugDB/ladybug welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

LadybugDB/ladybug has a recorded first-timer success rate of 76.9%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~13 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.0 places LadybugDB/ladybug in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for LadybugDB/ladybug?

The external pull request merge rate is 81.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in LadybugDB/ladybug?

Yes, LadybugDB/ladybug currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for LadybugDB/ladybug are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.