JakeStanger/ironbar - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Customisable Wayland GTK4 bar written in Rust.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 71%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is JakeStanger/ironbar welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

JakeStanger/ironbar has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in JakeStanger/ironbar respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.2 places JakeStanger/ironbar in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for JakeStanger/ironbar?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for JakeStanger/ironbar is 70.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in JakeStanger/ironbar?

JakeStanger/ironbar currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

JakeStanger
JakeStanger/ironbarA•Welcoming1.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
JakeStanger

JakeStanger/ironbar

1,488
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(66/100)Rust

Customisable Wayland GTK4 bar written in Rust.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.6/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Highly welcoming maintainers in JakeStanger/ironbar. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
70.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
29 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
70.6%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe58/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for JakeStanger/ironbar
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/JakeStanger/ironbar)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/JakeStanger/ironbar?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

If running another compositor like sway on another tty, and then exiting the main compositor on tty1 (in my case niri) relaunching the compositor leads to the workspace module showing nothing. Note that on sway I'm not using ironbar, but somehow launching sway breaks something in the ipc communication. To reproduce I have found a reliable way to replicate this: Launch niri and ironbar on tty1, workspace module works fine Launch sway on tty2 Go back to tty1, exit niri Launch niri again: the workspace module is now broken. My assumption is that ironbar tries connecting to sway's ipc socket instead of niri At this point something strange happens: if I quit both sway on tty2 and niri on tty1 and relaunch niri I expect to have a "fresh start", but instead the workspace module is still broken and shows failed to create module Workspaces: 0: File o directory non esistente (os error 2) So I believe that instead of "cleanly" reconnecting to the new niri socket ironbar tries connecting t

📅 Opened Jul 9, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I'd just like to be able to hover over certain modules to reveal other ones a la groups Describe the solution you'd like https://github.com/Alexays/Waybar/wiki/Module:-Group feels like it just makes sense and would be a relatively simple module to add, I use it to hide a bunch of my smaller rarely used modules behind a commonly used one I also use it to reveal the names of things on hover, such as if I hover on my bluetooth module it shows the currently connected devices, my volume one also hides a slider until I hover, saves a click. i think a simple way to add this would be to allow show_if to detect a hover event maybe?

📅 Opened Mar 30, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for JakeStanger/ironbar

When evaluating whether to contribute to JakeStanger/ironbar, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of JakeStanger/ironbar acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 70.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to JakeStanger/ironbar

01

Is JakeStanger/ironbar welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

JakeStanger/ironbar has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.2 places JakeStanger/ironbar in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for JakeStanger/ironbar?

The external pull request merge rate is 70.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in JakeStanger/ironbar?

Yes, JakeStanger/ironbar currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for JakeStanger/ironbar are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.