JabRef/jabref - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Desktop app for managing BibTeX and BibLaTeX (.bib) libraries

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 67%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is JabRef/jabref welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

JabRef/jabref has a recorded first-timer success rate of 49.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in JabRef/jabref respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.6 places JabRef/jabref in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for JabRef/jabref?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for JabRef/jabref is 67.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in JabRef/jabref?

JabRef/jabref currently has 14 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

JabRef
JabRef/jabrefA•Welcoming4.8k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
JabRef

JabRef/jabref

4,795
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(67/100)Java

Desktop app for managing BibTeX and BibLaTeX (.bib) libraries

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.7/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in JabRef/jabref. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
67.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
49.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
100 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
67.0%
Merge Gauge
49.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe41/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for JabRef/jabref
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/JabRef/jabref)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/JabRef/jabref?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

See also #17355 I have @Article{Agrawal2015, author = {Agrawal, Shikha and Agrawal, Jitendra}, date = {2015}, journaltitle = {Procedia Computer Science}, title = {Survey on Anomaly Detection using Data Mining Techniques}, doi = {10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.220}, issn = {1877-0509}, pages = {708-713}, volume = {60}, journal = {Procedia Computer Science}, publisher = {Elsevier BV}, } I press Ctrl+A and then Ctrl+C Then I go into LibreOffice I press Ctrl+V Expectection: highlighted code but I get

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 17 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

JabRef version Latest development branch build (please note build date below) Operating system GNU / Linux Details on version and operating system JabRef 6.0-beta.56--2026-09-26--eb78c4b Linux 7.2.8-200.nobara.fc44.x86_64 amd64 Java 25.0.4.1 JavaFX 27+30 Checked with the latest development build I made a backup of my libraries before testing the latest development version. I have tested the latest development version and the problem persists Steps to reproduce the behaviour Switch to dark mode via File > Preferences > General > Color Scheme Choose Theme: Primer Add an entry Open the entry editor and scroll down to the "Files and links" section. Click on the header to make the "file" field content visible. Add at least three files to the entry (How to link them) Unlink two of the three files (JabRef should still find them automatically in the chosen file directory) See that the background colour is dark and the text colour is also dark (Not good!) Select the files one by one. See

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Open Welcome Tab Click on "New example library" Double click "Tan_2021" Select tab "Citations" Click on BibTeX source for "Effect of ..." See Click "OK" Double click "Effect of ..." entry. Go to tab "biblatex source" See syntax highlight (introduced at #16328) Expected: At step 6, also the syntax highlighting is in place Task: Add the syntax highlighting also to the popup at step 6. Rename window title from "Show BibTeX source" to "BibTeX source". (If possible) Add button "Cancel", which cancels the edits. (This refs #12706, but I could not came up with nice button labels. "Accept edits" and "Cancel edits"? But IDK if we already have these translations)

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

JabRef version Latest development branch build (please note build date below) Operating system Windows Details on version and operating system No response Checked with the latest development build (copy version output from About dialog) I made a backup of my libraries before testing the latest development version. I have tested the latest development version and the problem persists Steps to reproduce the behaviour Open Welcome Tab Click on "New example library" Double click "Tokede_2011" Double click "Hooper_2012" Double click "Richard_2017" Right lick on "Hooper_2012". Select "Delete entry". Confirm Click on Back Expected: Richard_2017 selected Actual behavior: WARN: Tried to access out of bounds index -1 in entriesViewModel Click on Back Now, Richard_2017 is selected Appendix No response

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 8 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

On the Welcome tab, click "New example library" (opens Chocolate.bib) In the search bar, enter cocoa Click the "Search across libraries in a new window" button (right of the search field) In the dialog "Search results from open libraries", select the entry "Cocoa and Cardiovascular Health" Press Ctrl+C Paste into a text editor Expected at step 6: The selected entry is pasted, same as when copying from the main table Current behavior at step 6: nothing (or old clipboard content) is pasted. Hints: Dialog: GlobalSearchResultDialog.java Reuse the copy handling of the main table (MainTable) instead of reimplementing it Keyboard shortcuts documentation Ctrl+C in the dialog has to respect the "copy" key binding from preferences (i.e., go through KeyBindingRepository)

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 9 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for JabRef/jabref

When evaluating whether to contribute to JabRef/jabref, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of JabRef/jabref acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 67.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to JabRef/jabref

01

Is JabRef/jabref welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

JabRef/jabref has a recorded first-timer success rate of 49.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.6 places JabRef/jabref in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for JabRef/jabref?

The external pull request merge rate is 67.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in JabRef/jabref?

Yes, JabRef/jabref currently has 14 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for JabRef/jabref are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.