Imbad0202/academic-research-skills - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100

External PR Merge Rate: 90%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Imbad0202/academic-research-skills welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills has a recorded first-timer success rate of 44.4%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Imbad0202/academic-research-skills respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 41.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.8 places Imbad0202/academic-research-skills in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Imbad0202/academic-research-skills?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Imbad0202/academic-research-skills is 90.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Imbad0202/academic-research-skills?

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

Imbad0202
Imbad0202/academic-research-skillsA•Welcoming50.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Imbad0202

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

50,113
InactiveA•Welcoming(65/100)Python

Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
50%

Strict review standards in Imbad0202/academic-research-skills. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
90.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
44.4%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
6 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
90.2%
Merge Gauge
44.4%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe49/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Discussion #848 reports two acronym failure modes common in drafted text: an acronym defined more than once, or never defined. ARS has scattered prompt and checklist guidance on this (abstract_bilingual_agent.md:130, citation_compliance_agent.md:318, the abstract template and guide checklists, intro_title_rhetoric_guide.md:92) but no deterministic manuscript-wide check. writing_quality_check.md sections A-E carry no acronym rule and the formatter_agent Final Quality Checklist has none. Scope. One deterministic script, scripts/check_acronyms.py (stdlib only, no model call, never edits the manuscript), run by the caller and consumed on two sides. v1 rules (journal copyediting defaults; author and venue requirements take precedence per writing_quality_check.md "Priority and scope"): First use is defined: full form, then the acronym in parentheses; later uses take the acronym only. Definition scopes are independent: the body, the English abstract, and the Chinese abstract each define sepa

📅 Opened Sep 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

When evaluating whether to contribute to Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Imbad0202/academic-research-skills acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 90.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

01

Is Imbad0202/academic-research-skills welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills has a recorded first-timer success rate of 44.4%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.8 places Imbad0202/academic-research-skills in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Imbad0202/academic-research-skills?

The external pull request merge rate is 90.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Imbad0202/academic-research-skills?

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Imbad0202/academic-research-skills are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.