Ikalus1988/MisakaNet - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

📚 A zero-dependency, git-backed micro-lesson library for AI Agents to asynchronously share and search verified debugging experience. | https://misakanet.org

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 39%

Response Time: 12h

First Timer Success: 31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ikalus1988/MisakaNet welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Ikalus1988/MisakaNet has a recorded first-timer success rate of 30.8%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Ikalus1988/MisakaNet respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 11.9 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.9 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.9 places Ikalus1988/MisakaNet in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Ikalus1988/MisakaNet?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Ikalus1988/MisakaNet is 38.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Ikalus1988/MisakaNet?

Ikalus1988/MisakaNet currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Ikalus1988
Ikalus1988/MisakaNetA•Welcoming526
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Ikalus1988

Ikalus1988/MisakaNet

526
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(64/100)Python

📚 A zero-dependency, git-backed micro-lesson library for AI Agents to asynchronously share and search verified debugging experience. | https://misakanet.org

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in Ikalus1988/MisakaNet. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
11 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
38.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
30.8%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
54 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
38.6%
Merge Gauge
30.8%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe46/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Ikalus1988/MisakaNet
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Ikalus1988/MisakaNet)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Ikalus1988/MisakaNet?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

数据来自 讨论 #2611(2026-10-01 对 D1 的读取)。 audio(5 条)+ wechat(5 条)+ feishu(18 条)+ openclaw(6 条):这一簇的共性是每一环都在别人的 地盘上(模型、微信客户端、平台策略),所以失败信号往往长得不像失败。 已记录的三类: GPT-SoVITS:HuBERT 的 16kHz 采样率、ARPABET 音素格式、以及参考音频 bug(给女声出来男声); FFmpeg 编码:用了不存在的 -format ogg,输出 0 字节(命令成功退出,没人看输出大小); PowerShell 中文编码:UTF-8 被 PowerShell 5.1 当 GBK 读,TTS 返回乱码"嗯嗯"声; 微信系:wcferry 要求微信版本精确匹配(3.9.12.56 不兼容 39.5.x)、wxauto 必须在 Windows Python 下(WSL 里 pip install 直接报错)、OpenClaw 重装时没停服务导致 systemd 与手动进程抢端口; 反馈收集:微信没有点赞/踩按钮,用 JSONL 队列做审核。 完成判据 优先写两篇(其余可各

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

数据来自 讨论 #2611(2026-10-01 对 D1 的读取)。 crypto-ops(3 条)+ web3(2 条):有人用 AI Agent 在 Base 链上做 marketplace 赏金任务,踩的坑按 会真丢钱排序: USDC 基本单位 vs 人类金额 —— Agent 付了 1000 倍(以为 1000 USDC = $1;实际 1 USDC = 1,000,000 base units); USDC 打到了 Ethereum 主网而不是 Base —— 而且那个地址 0 ETH 付 Gas; Opire Bounty 的认领、收款与信任分级; Superteam Earn API 提交返回 Insufficient credits; TaskBounty POST 成功但 solver_readiness 仍然失败。 这类错误的特点是不可逆:链上打款没有"再试一次"。而现有课程是零散经验,没有一篇能让人在按下发送 前把这几件事按顺序核对一遍。 完成判据 一篇课程,把发送前的核对清单写出来并排序:金额换算(先写 decimals 与 base unit 算式,必要时用 parseUnits 而不是手算)、目标链 id 与合约地址(同一 symbol 在

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

数据来自 讨论 #2611(2026-10-01 对 D1 的读取)。 fanuc 是第二大领域(36 条,仅次于 devops 的 133),内容覆盖报警代码速查(MOTN / PROG / SYST / COMM / INTP)、报警严重等级与颜色代码(哪些停机器人、哪些切伺服电源)、DCS 双 CPU 监控、.VR/.SV 备份文件的 二进制解析、EtherNet/IP 与 OMAP 通讯、以及 DO[66] 这类"确认激活却找不到定义"的现场问题。 缺口不是知识,是入口:这些知识散在 36 篇里,而检索的形态是"我手上有一条报警,我要知道它意味着什么"。 搜 KAREL INTP-316 或 LS /MN /END section regex 能命中,是因为有人恰好把代码写进了正文;没有一条按 子系统 + 代码组织的索引。 完成判据 一份 fanuc 域的报警代码索引课程/文档:按子系统(MOTN / PROG / SYST / COMM / INTP / SRVO …) 分组,每条给出:代码、典型含义、严重等级(停机器人 / 切伺服 / 仅告警)、以及

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

第三轮:版本 / 文档漂移猎捕 —— 报告门禁看不见的东西(两条路都能拿信用) 本仓的门禁只覆盖受管面;漂移真正藏身的地方是不受管的文档。这一轮就测这个,而且每条发现都能 变成两种贡献之一: intake 路:报告一条对不上的事实(命令 + 输出),走 misakanet_submit_intake 或直接评论; 贡献路:把其中一条改掉(docs PR),或者把"我是怎么被它骗到的"写成课(lessons/contrib/)。 两条都算信用(排行榜 + Hall of Fame + 本 issue 里 @ 你)。 第 0 步:先跑受管面的门禁(期望全绿 —— 这是基线) python3 -m pytest tests/test_version_consistency.py tests/test_setup_docs_consistency.py \ tests/test_mirror_consistency.py -q # 期望 24 passed python3 scripts/sync_lesson_count.py --check # 期望 every managed … == 语料数 python3 scripts/push_preflight.py --all >/dev/null; echo $? # 期

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

背景 status.md 里这三个都是 🔵 vendor-only,但它们都是命令行工具,也就是说验证不需要截图、可以无头完成: 客户端 用户级配置 项目级 键 URL 字段 备注 OpenCode ~/.config/opencode/opencode.json opencode.json mcp url(type: "remote") 先试 Streamable HTTP、回落 SSE Kiro (AWS) ~/.kiro/settings/mcp.json .kiro/settings/mcp.json mcpServers url 启动即支持(2025-07-14) Oh-my-Pi (omp) ~/.omp/agent/mcp.json .omp/mcp.json — type: "http" 真包是 @oh-my-pi/pi-coding-agent;npm 上 oh-my-pi 是另一个无关包 目标 每个客户端一个文件:docs/integrations/{opencode,kiro,oh-my-pi}.md + 对应 field report。三个文件互不重叠,可以只认领其中一个。 验收标准(每个客户端) 配置片段标注官方来源链接 真机跑一次并把命令/版本/输出摘录写进 docs/field-reports/2026-09-XX-<client>-mcp-smoke.md 记录该客户端读什么规则文件(OpenCode/Kiro 有 ste

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Ikalus1988/MisakaNet

When evaluating whether to contribute to Ikalus1988/MisakaNet, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Ikalus1988/MisakaNet acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 11 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 38.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Ikalus1988/MisakaNet

01

Is Ikalus1988/MisakaNet welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Ikalus1988/MisakaNet has a recorded first-timer success rate of 30.8%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~11 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.9 places Ikalus1988/MisakaNet in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Ikalus1988/MisakaNet?

The external pull request merge rate is 38.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Ikalus1988/MisakaNet?

Yes, Ikalus1988/MisakaNet currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Ikalus1988/MisakaNet are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.