Analyze your RNA sequencing data without writing a single line of code
C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 71/100
External PR Merge Rate: 93%
Response Time: 3h
First Timer Success: 100%
GuyTeichman/RNAlysis has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
Maintainers in GuyTeichman/RNAlysis respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 3.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.
The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 70.9 places GuyTeichman/RNAlysis in the S tier.
The external contributor pull request merge rate for GuyTeichman/RNAlysis is 93.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.
GuyTeichman/RNAlysis does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.
Strict review standards in GuyTeichman/RNAlysis. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.
Average Response Latency
Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.
External Acceptance Rate
Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.
First PR Conversion
Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.
Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.
[](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/GuyTeichman/RNAlysis?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)
Historical health & responsiveness evolution
External PR acceptance
First PR success rate
50% receive response in
90% receive response in
Maintainer review activity heatmap & prime window prediction
Calculating local time...
Calculating local time...
Detected: UTC
Maintainers are most responsive around 22:00 UTC (22:00 UTC in your timezone). Recommended submission window is Wednesday - Friday from 20:00 to 00:00 UTC (20:00 - 00:00 UTC local).
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~4 hours (96% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~15 hours (42% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
Follow-up from the code review of #132 (which hardened the two create_canvas methods against a flaky native teardown crash by reordering to removeWidget() → setParent(None) → deleteLater()). The review flagged two remaining spots that use the older teardown order / skip the reparent step. These are low risk — they operate on static input widgets (a QLabel, ordinary parameter widgets), not on a continuously-repainting matplotlib FigureCanvas like the one that caused the crash in #132 — so they are not believed to reproduce that crash. Filing purely for consistency/defensive hygiene, not as a bug. Sites rnalysis/gui/gui.py:1117-1118 (SetOperationWindow) and rnalysis/gui/gui.py:1360-1361 (SetVisualizationWindow) — the help_link label is torn down as: self.parameter_widgets['help_link'].deleteLater() self.<grid>.removeWidget(self.parameter_widgets['help_link']) i.e. deleteLater() before removeWidget(), and the widget is never reparented. Reorder to removeWidget() → (setParent
Type of change Documentation — correct outdated dependency instructions. Problem docs/source/installation.rst tells Linux users to install qt5-image-formats-plugins (Debian/Ubuntu) / qt5-qtimageformats (Fedora) so the in-app tutorial videos will play. RNAlysis switched to Qt6 in v4.1.0, so the Qt5 image-format plugins are the wrong package. Locations docs/source/installation.rst: 76–78. Suggested fix Update to the Qt6 equivalents (e.g. qt6-image-formats-plugins on Debian/Ubuntu; please confirm the correct current Fedora package name before merging).
Type of change Documentation bug — commands don't run. Problem The "From sources" section of docs/source/installation.rst shows: $ python -m pip setup.py install $ python -m pip setup.py install .[all] python -m pip setup.py install is not a valid command (pip has no setup.py subcommand), and .[all] is mis-placed in the second line. Locations docs/source/installation.rst: 140, 146. Suggested fix Replace with modern equivalents: $ pip install . $ pip install .[all]
Type of change Documentation bug — copy-paste-breaking code examples. Problem In docs/source/user_guide.rst (the programmatic-interface guide — the one place code examples must be runnable), ~18 code examples read: >>> from *RNAlysis* import filtering The *RNAlysis* is reST emphasis markup that leaked into a literal code block, so anyone copying the example gets a SyntaxError. It should be from rnalysis import …. Locations docs/source/user_guide.rst: 20, 243, 1036, 1043, 1049, 1056, 1063, 1092, 1119, 1179, 1777, 1805, 1819, 1832, 1859, 1933, 1950, 1965. Suggested fix Replace from *RNAlysis* import <module> with from rnalysis import <module> in all listed code blocks. Mechanical find/replace, good first issue.
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
When evaluating whether to contribute to GuyTeichman/RNAlysis, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of GuyTeichman/RNAlysis acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 93.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
GuyTeichman/RNAlysis has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 70.9 places GuyTeichman/RNAlysis in the Elite tier.
The external pull request merge rate is 93.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
GuyTeichman/RNAlysis does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.
All metrics displayed for GuyTeichman/RNAlysis are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.