GDQuest/GDScript-formatter - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A faster code formatter for GDScript and Godot 4

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 50/100

External PR Merge Rate: 100%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GDQuest/GDScript-formatter welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

GDQuest/GDScript-formatter has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in GDQuest/GDScript-formatter respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 68.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 49.8 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 49.8 places GDQuest/GDScript-formatter in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for GDQuest/GDScript-formatter?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for GDQuest/GDScript-formatter is 100.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in GDQuest/GDScript-formatter?

GDQuest/GDScript-formatter currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

GDQuest
GDQuest/GDScript-formatterB•Solid470
GitHub
Back to Explorer
GDQuest

GDQuest/GDScript-formatter

470
Active (30d)B•Solid(50/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Rust

A faster code formatter for GDScript and Godot 4

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

High-Friction Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
5.0/10
Patience Score
6.0/10
Nitpick Rate
65%

Rigorous architecture standards (100% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in GDQuest/GDScript-formatter.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
100.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
100.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe40/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for GDQuest/GDScript-formatter
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/GDQuest/GDScript-formatter)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/GDQuest/GDScript-formatter?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Description The rule private-access is triggered when accessing a private instance member from a static context within the same class. See the example below. The rule message is "... should not be accessed from outside its class" which let me think this is not intentional and is a bug. Reproduce class_name Foo var _data: int func _method() -> void: pass static func do(foo: Foo) -> void: foo._data = 0 foo._method() Expected behaviour No linter rule triggered. Observed behaviour The above example triggers : [private-access] Private variable '_data' should not be accessed from outside its class [private-access] Private method '_method' should not be accessed from outside its class But this is not an access from outside the class...

📅 Opened Jul 16, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Description Using GDScript formatter 0.18.2 with Godot 4.6 on Windows On linting a file, problematic lines are colored in red or yellow to indicate a linter error or warning. These colors disappear within 1-2 seconds of editing the script in Godot script editor (even without saving the file). Reproduce Write a script with a linter issue : func _init() -> void: print("hello") pass # <- this produces a linter warning (unnecessary-pass) Lint it (Ctrl+S or Format > Lint Current Script). The pass line is now colored in yellow. Edit it (you can just add a new line, or edit the comment). Expected behaviour The pass line coloration do not change. Observed behaviour The pass line coloration disappear after 1-2 seconds. Additional informations This behaviour can be indirectly triggered by saving the script, because saving the script can trigger the formatting and edit the script. Also: Godot seems to redraw the script editor if the script is edited, then left unedited for 1-2 seconds

📅 Opened Feb 10, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for GDQuest/GDScript-formatter

When evaluating whether to contribute to GDQuest/GDScript-formatter, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of GDQuest/GDScript-formatter acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 100.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to GDQuest/GDScript-formatter

01

Is GDQuest/GDScript-formatter welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

GDQuest/GDScript-formatter has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 49.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 49.8 places GDQuest/GDScript-formatter in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for GDQuest/GDScript-formatter?

The external pull request merge rate is 100.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in GDQuest/GDScript-formatter?

Yes, GDQuest/GDScript-formatter currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for GDQuest/GDScript-formatter are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.